2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2015.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and assessment of different modeling approaches for size-mass estimation of mango fruits (Mangifera indica L., cv. ‘Nam Dokmai’)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A score between zero and unity indicates the model's acceptability while unity indicates the model's optimal performance. The NSE and R 2 have been used as a performance indicator in similar study (Schulze et al, 2015).…”
Section: Rulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A score between zero and unity indicates the model's acceptability while unity indicates the model's optimal performance. The NSE and R 2 have been used as a performance indicator in similar study (Schulze et al, 2015).…”
Section: Rulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the usage of weighing devices can be eliminated from the packaging line. Spreer [28] and Schulze [29] determined the mass of the Chok Anan mangoes and Nam Dokmai mangoes using the physical properties of the mango. Relationships between the physical traits were determined and a high correlation between the mass and the physical traits was found.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schulze et al 31 compared three different models for mass estimation of mango fruits, using simple linear regression, multiple linear regression and artificial neural networks; they found that the latter method was the most accurate and robust model for mass estimation. Predictive accuracy of machine learning and linear regression techniques for crop yield in 10 crop datasets was also compared 32 ; the results showed that M5-Prime model trees achieved the largest number of crop yield predictions with the lowest errors (and they are more interpretable than K-Nearest Neighbours, the other system with lowest error).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%