2014
DOI: 10.1111/bjc.12052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and assessment of brief versions of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire and the Ruminative Response Scale

Abstract: The brief versions of the PSWQ and RRS are time-efficient and valid instruments for the screening of worry and depressive rumination. Their use in clinical practice is recommended to inform treatment and/or to select individuals at risk for development of psychological disorders who may benefit from preventive interventions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
(103 reference statements)
1
55
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Other depressive rumination related scales were also developed for different age group or different content, such as the Children’s RRS, Adapted RRS, and rumination sub-scale of Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire [7]. Among them, the RRS has emerged as the most frequently used self-report measure of depressive rumination in both research and clinical practice for its wide target population and stable reliability and validity [8]. However, following its widespread use, some researchers questioned whether the observed relationship between rumination and depression was due to similar item content of RRS and depression related scales [911].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other depressive rumination related scales were also developed for different age group or different content, such as the Children’s RRS, Adapted RRS, and rumination sub-scale of Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire [7]. Among them, the RRS has emerged as the most frequently used self-report measure of depressive rumination in both research and clinical practice for its wide target population and stable reliability and validity [8]. However, following its widespread use, some researchers questioned whether the observed relationship between rumination and depression was due to similar item content of RRS and depression related scales [911].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we extend the previous work by assessing subjective health and several health indicators and coping, in addition to distress and emotional well‐being. Although one previous study found no relationship between subjective time perception and similar measures of distress in typical daily life (worry and anxiety; Tipples, ), these states were measured with general measures in that study (i.e., Penn State Worry Questionnaire, Topper, Emmelkamp, Watkins, & Ehring, ; “In the last hour I have been worrying”). In this study, we focus on target‐specific worry and anxiety regarding a personally significant but uncertain future outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Personality characteristics include smoking (82,94,111), alcohol consumption and drug use (77,91,94), relationship quality (91, 112, 113) (partner) violence experience (96,112,(114)(115)(116), threatening life events in the past 12 months (79,80,91,(117)(118)(119)(120), physical activity and sedentary behavior (94,106,111,(121)(122)(123), stress (15,43,79,124,125), need for affect, emotional avoidance (126)(127)(128), anxiety sensitivity (129-131), sense of mastery, internal locus of control (79,(132)(133)(134)(135), worry (136)(137)(138), self-worth (100,104,(139)(140)(141), and loneliness (142)…”
Section: Other Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%