2019
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.0820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Assessment of a Novel Composite Pathologic Risk Stratification for Surgically Resected Human Papillomavirus–Associated Oropharyngeal Cancer

Abstract: Human papillomavirus-associated (HPV+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is a distinct form of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with its own American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. However, pathologic risk stratification for HPV+ OPSCC largely remains based on the experience with HPV-unassociated HNSCC.OBJECTIVE To compare the survival discrimination of traditional pathologic risk stratification for both HPV+ OPSCC and HPV-unassociated HNSCC and derive a novel pathologic ris… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent efforts have focused on re-stratifying traditional guideline-based risks to account for their summative risk on oncologic outcomes. Cramer and colleagues designed and assessed a novel composite risk score that stratified patients into 3 risk groups which predict significantly different outcomes based on pathological risk (5-year OS for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk: 76.2% vs. 54.5% vs. 40.9%) [ 15 ]. This analysis showed that microscopic (HR 1.66, 95%CI 1.18–2.32) and macroscopic ENE (HR 2.20, 95%CI 1.28–3.75) as well as LVI (HR 1.54, 95%CI 1.15–2.06) were associated with poor survival, however, LN4/5 and PSM were not prognostically significant in HPV-OPC on multivariate analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recent efforts have focused on re-stratifying traditional guideline-based risks to account for their summative risk on oncologic outcomes. Cramer and colleagues designed and assessed a novel composite risk score that stratified patients into 3 risk groups which predict significantly different outcomes based on pathological risk (5-year OS for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk: 76.2% vs. 54.5% vs. 40.9%) [ 15 ]. This analysis showed that microscopic (HR 1.66, 95%CI 1.18–2.32) and macroscopic ENE (HR 2.20, 95%CI 1.28–3.75) as well as LVI (HR 1.54, 95%CI 1.15–2.06) were associated with poor survival, however, LN4/5 and PSM were not prognostically significant in HPV-OPC on multivariate analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that 15–20% of patients with HPV-OPC experience disease recurrence [ 4 , 5 ], debate has emerged regarding patient selection for adjuvant radiotherapy in surgically treated HPV-OPC. Retrospective studies have revealed that adverse features in HPV-OPC may be associated with worse overall survival (OS) [ 14 , 15 ]. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends adjuvant therapy for surgically treated HPV-OPC demonstrating AF [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most studies have focused on patients managed with definitive chemoradiotherapy and showed that prognostication can be improved by incorporating advanced T stage and N stage based on nasopharyngeal cancer N categories [ 10 , 12 , 36 , 46 , 47 ]. A study explored surgically treated patients and revealed that a composite risk stratification system which includes pathologic adverse features such as lymphovascular invasion, surgical margins, extranodal extension, advanced T stage, and the number of metastatic lymph nodes improve prognostication [ 48 ]. However, these models need further validation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We received 166 manuscripts associated with the 2019 American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) Annual Meeting, and with the outstanding effort by Neal Futran, MD, DMD, and the staffs of the AHNS and the JAMA Network, we were able to quickly review and publish 30 articles, 5 of which were published simultaneously with their presentation at that meeting. [1][2][3][4][5] This past year, JAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery experienced an increase in the number of submissions, from 1102 in 2018 to 1379 in 2019. We received 980 unsolicited original research submissions, which is an increase of 209 (27.1%) from 2018.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%