Development and Application of Novel InDel Markers in Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) Through Whole-Genome Re-Sequencing

Abstract

Flax is an important oil and fibre crop grown in Northern Europe, Canada, India, and China. The development of molecular markers has accelerated the process of flax molecular breeding and has improved yield and quality. Presently, simple sequence repeat (SSR) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers in the whole genome have been developed for flax. However, the development of flax insertion/deletion (InDel) markers has not been reported. A total of 17,110 InDel markers were identified by comparing whole-genome re-sequencing data of two accessions (87 − 3 and 84 − 3) with the flax reference genome. The length of InDels ranged from 1–277 bp, with 1–15 bp accounting for the highest rate (95.55%). The most common InDels were in the form of single nucleotide (8840), dinucleotide (3700), and trinucleotide (1349), and chromosome 2 (1505) showed the highest number of InDels among flax chromosomes, while chromosome 10 (913) presented with the lowest number. From 17,110 InDel markers, 90 primers that were evenly distributed in the flax genome were selected. Thirty-two pairs of polymorphic primers were detected in two flax accessions, and the polymorphism rate was 40.70%. Furthermore, genetic diversity analysis, population structure and principal component analyse (PCA) divided 69 flax accessions into two categories, namely oilseed flax and fibre flax using 32 pairs of polymorphic primers. Additionally, correlation analysis showed that InDel-26 and InDel-81 were associated with oil content traits, and two candidate genes (lus10031535 and lus10025284) tightly linked to InDel-26 or InDel-81, might be involved in flax lipid biosynthesis and lipid metabolism. This study is the first to develop InDel markers based on re-sequencing in flax and clustered the markers into two well-separated groups for oil and fibre. The results demonstrated that InDel markers developed herein could be used for flax germplasm identification, genetic diversity analysis, and molecular marker-assisted breeding.

An overview of bioinformatics technology application in the study of novel coronavirus

“…4 and No. 5 is 95.39% and 93.87% respectively, which are relatively complete and can be used for the subsequent analysis [6].…”

“…This method is not accurate enough, because virus contamination during the sampling will lead to false positive results, while false negative results may be caused when the sampling target contains fewer viruses. However, positive samples obtained by nucleic acid testing are still the source of many bioinformatics analysis samples [5,6].…”