2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and application of a rubric to compare strategies for improving access to health care in rural communities in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A common thought has been that rural residence may relate to reduced access to care [ 4 , 6 , 7 ]. In fact, a national study of cancer clinical trials found that when access to care was uniform, rural and urban subjects had similar outcomes [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common thought has been that rural residence may relate to reduced access to care [ 4 , 6 , 7 ]. In fact, a national study of cancer clinical trials found that when access to care was uniform, rural and urban subjects had similar outcomes [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the PDCA cycle provided a framework to follow as we met regularly to discuss poor mental health. The PDCA cycle has been used in many healthcare situations, including quality improvement (Bassuni et al 2021;Stan 2018), targeted disease management (Demirel 2019), and to improve access to care (George & Hatsukami 2020;Schuller et al 2019). We demonstrate another use of the PDCA cycle in identifying and planning a community intervention, and our process can be used by others as an example of implementation science.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…They demonstrated that using a rubric scoring scale is appropriate for assessing the practical competence of students since it may translate qualitative criteria into quantitative forms on a grading scale. Most rubric development and implementation research focus on subjective assessments only (Grainger, 2021;Minnich et al, 2018;Schuller et al, 2019;Stanley et al, 2020).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%