2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2010.09.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and application of a quantitative lateral flow immunoassay for fumonisins in maize

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
77
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(33 reference statements)
3
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, LFIAs combine the advantages of immunoassays, such as applicability to a wide range of analytes, high specificity, high detectability and little or no need for preanalytical sample preparation, with the simplic-ity and rapidity of the immunochromatographic format [1]. defined positions along the strip determines the formation of coloured bands that are visually detected to provide a qualita-tive result (i.e., presence or absence of the analyte in the sam-ple) or measured with a suitable device (an optical scanner or a smartphone-embedded camera) to provide objective, semi-quantitative information [2][3][4]. The use of alternative labels has recently gained wide acceptance, showing advantages in terms of assay sensitivity, but at the expense of assay simplic-ity and non-instrumental requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, LFIAs combine the advantages of immunoassays, such as applicability to a wide range of analytes, high specificity, high detectability and little or no need for preanalytical sample preparation, with the simplic-ity and rapidity of the immunochromatographic format [1]. defined positions along the strip determines the formation of coloured bands that are visually detected to provide a qualita-tive result (i.e., presence or absence of the analyte in the sam-ple) or measured with a suitable device (an optical scanner or a smartphone-embedded camera) to provide objective, semi-quantitative information [2][3][4]. The use of alternative labels has recently gained wide acceptance, showing advantages in terms of assay sensitivity, but at the expense of assay simplic-ity and non-instrumental requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spherical gold nanoparticle of putative diameter comprised between 20 and 40 nm (s-GNPs) were synthesized using the citrate reduction method [32], while multi-branched desert rose-like gold nanoparticles (DR-GNPs) were prepared using a seeding growth approach adapted from that previously reported by Ji et al [11]. TEM analysis allowed to visualize GNP morphology: s-GNPs showed the expected spherical shape (Fig.…”
Section: Gnps Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antibodies were labeled with s-GNPs as previously described [32] through the adsorption of proteins onto GNPs surface. The s-GNPs were adjusted to the desired pH with carbonate buffer and the amount of Ab defined from the titration was added to 1 mL of s-GNPs.…”
Section: Preparation Of S-gnp-labeled Antibodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calibration curves were carried out by plotting the ratio between the intensity of the Test and the Control lines (T/C) for OTA standards (0-1-2-4-8-20 μg/l) versus the log of OTA concentration [29]. The calibration curve was determined by a nonlinear regression analysis of the data using the four-parameter logistic equation.…”
Section: Lateral Flow Immunoassaymentioning
confidence: 99%