2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2016.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and application of a multiplex PCR assay for detection of the Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin-encoding genes cpe and becAB

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, prevalence of various toxin genes in C. perfringens was revealed for isolates from clinical specimens, most of which were feces derived from sporadic diarrheal cases. CPE has been implicated in gastroenteritis in humans and documented to be produced by 2%–8% of C. perfringens isolates from diarrhea in the community [8,10,11,28]. Similar prevalence of cpe (4%) was reported for isolates from retail meat [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the present study, prevalence of various toxin genes in C. perfringens was revealed for isolates from clinical specimens, most of which were feces derived from sporadic diarrheal cases. CPE has been implicated in gastroenteritis in humans and documented to be produced by 2%–8% of C. perfringens isolates from diarrhea in the community [8,10,11,28]. Similar prevalence of cpe (4%) was reported for isolates from retail meat [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…C. perfringens type A strains producing CPE (type F) are responsible for 5%–20% of all antibiotic-associated diarrhea and non-food-borne gastrointestinal diseases [1,8]. Among C. perfringens isolates from human diarrheal diseases, detection rates of CPE gene ( cpe ) were described as 4.9%–7.8% in different countries [9,10,11]. However, prevalence of C. perfringens toxins (particularly other than CPE) in human clinical isolates has not yet been systematically studied, although a low prevalence (0.78%) of BEC/CPILE ( bec/cpile ) was shown in only one report in Japan [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most widely published method for investigating C. perfringens isolates from outbreaks is the use of diagnostic PCR for the toxins used in the typing scheme as well as c pb2 [1,32,33,34,35,36,37]. This study has shown that toxin diversity may be much greater than previously revealed and restricting diagnostics to PCR may be missing key information regarding C. perfringens pathogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Laboratory diagnosis of C. perfringens can be done by bacteriologic culture as well as by detecting a bacterial toxin [197][198][199][200]. Nowadays genetic methods are available and allow a rapid much typing of C. perfringens [201][202][203][204]. These techniques are precise and quick; but only suggest a gene's existence, and can assure neither a present nor an active toxin that could be responsible of physical damage.…”
Section: Perfringens Toxinsmentioning
confidence: 99%