2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2014.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and application of a living probabilistic safety assessment tool: Multi-objective multi-dimensional optimization of surveillance requirements in NPPs considering their ageing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, in Eqs. (6) and 7A Next, the degradation function can be formulated for the time immediately before and after the second maintenance activity, arriving at chronological time t 2 as follows:…”
Section: Addressing Maintenance Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, in Eqs. (6) and 7A Next, the degradation function can be formulated for the time immediately before and after the second maintenance activity, arriving at chronological time t 2 as follows:…”
Section: Addressing Maintenance Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degradation function immediately before and after the first maintenance activity is given by Eqs. (6) and 7, respectively. Next, ( ) for the time immediately before and after performing the second maintenance activity, named and respectively, can be formulated as follows:…”
Section: Addressing Maintenance Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, each probability of top event is determined by using fault tree analysis. Data of component failure is adopted AP1000 data which was published and IAEA generic data [8][9][10][11][12]. Finally, the total probability of event sequences are calculated.…”
Section: Kne Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis is done by using event tree and each probability of top event is calculated by using fault tree analysis. Failure rate of component used in calculation is based on AP1000 data that is published by Westinghouse and data from IAEA Tecdoc [8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,22 There are also cases where improvement is represented according to a normal distribution. 23 For systems or components with hidden failures, many models consider a constant improvement factor, [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] while other improvement factors are less frequent such as the random improvement factor 32 and the CI factor. 33,34 The continuous improvement of processes and activities, in general, is one of the main objectives of managers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%