2008
DOI: 10.3133/ofr20081251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Application of a Decision Support System for Water Management Investigations in the Upper Yakima River, Washington

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Integrated Plan also provides an important foundation for developing and testing a basin-specific decision support system that can examine tradeoffs between different waterallocation schemes for people, fish and wildlife (see Bovee et al, 2008). Stream flows could be enhanced (e.g., increased, cooled) during critical periods by proper planning and forecasting and reservoir/irrigation manipulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Integrated Plan also provides an important foundation for developing and testing a basin-specific decision support system that can examine tradeoffs between different waterallocation schemes for people, fish and wildlife (see Bovee et al, 2008). Stream flows could be enhanced (e.g., increased, cooled) during critical periods by proper planning and forecasting and reservoir/irrigation manipulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The habitat analysis focused on suitable hydraulic features (e.g., depth and velocity at a given discharge) and not water temperature since two-dimensional simulations of water temperature were not available. The watershed model (Mastin 2008) provided a discharge time series in each reach for baseline , P1, and P2 scenarios; a river-management model (Zagona et al 2001) modified the discharge time series with Yakima River operational rules (USBR 2002); a 2D model (Steffler and Blackburn 2002) provided spatially explicit depth and velocity; while an expert panel provided salmonid habitat criteria using a Delphi consensus approach (Bovee et al 2008;Zuboy 1981). Discharge-habitat functions were generated for each salmonid life stage (e.g., spawning, rearing) in main stem and side channels, and habitat time series for baseline, P1 and P2 scenarios.…”
Section: Habitat Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Despite extensive urban encroachment and revetment, there are numerous secondary channels in this reach that remain interconnected at moderate discharges (Bovee et al 2008). The Wapato reach has a total valley length of approximately 35 km, extending from Union Gap to the confluence of Satus Creek, near Sunnyside, Washington ( Fig.…”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Wapato reach, headed by the Fig. 1 The location of five reaches that were identified as important to salmonids in the Yakima River in southcentral Washington (Snyder and Stanford 2001;Bovee et al 2008). The two lower reaches (Gap and Wapato) are the focal areas highlighted in our study Sunnyside Diversion Dam, has a 5 % exceedance flow of 204.2 cms, a 50 % exceedance flow of 35.4 cms, and a 90 % exceedance flow of 9.6 cms.…”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation