2011
DOI: 10.1108/08858621111144415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing the value perception of the business customer through service modularity

Abstract: PurposeThe present challenge for many service firms is to develop an offering that is flexible and open for tailoring and at the same time achieves efficiency through standardizing processes. Modularity has been suggested as being one tool for achieving this. The goal of the present study is to find out how services provided in modular form (here referred to as service modularity) can exert an influence on the value perception of the customer in the professional services field.Design/methodology/approachEmpiri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
79
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
79
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to coordinate and reproduce service innovation initiatives, the modular approach considers service element as part of a platform with resources that can be used for different customers and different needs. This study contributes to previous theory on modularity where customer resources not have been taken into consideration (See, for example, Bask, Lipponen, Rajahonka, & Tinnilä, 2010Rahikka, Ulkuniemi, & Pekkarinen, 2011). Paper III emphasizes modularization and modular strategies and Paper V develops a typology for interaction modes in service innovation.…”
Section: Summary and Synthesis Of Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In order to coordinate and reproduce service innovation initiatives, the modular approach considers service element as part of a platform with resources that can be used for different customers and different needs. This study contributes to previous theory on modularity where customer resources not have been taken into consideration (See, for example, Bask, Lipponen, Rajahonka, & Tinnilä, 2010Rahikka, Ulkuniemi, & Pekkarinen, 2011). Paper III emphasizes modularization and modular strategies and Paper V develops a typology for interaction modes in service innovation.…”
Section: Summary and Synthesis Of Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Feasibility and potential advantages of service modularization are also analyzed in this research. Advantages of service modularization includes cost reduction, high service quality, service customization, flexibility, reusability, standardization, and simplification (Burr, 2005;de Blok, Luijkx, Meijboom, & Schols, 2010;Rahikka, Ulkuniemi, & Pekkarinen, 2011). Böttcher and Klingner (2011) also propose that service modularization can minimize the problems in service offerings, such as loss of economies of scale caused by no standardization of complex services, less structured planning and provision caused by no ability to handle the service complexity, reinventing or re-planning existing service offerings resulted from no opportunity to reuse existing service offerings, and suboptimal offerings derived from no or poorly documented service catalogues.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connection of various types of innovation, such as deployment and organization in this case, offers a potential research avenue. Service researchers also call for more insight into how to develop flexible, customized offerings while achieving efficiency in deployment through standardized processes (Rahikka, Ulkuniemi, & Pekkarinen, 2011). To develop and elaborate on deployment issues, the concept of service modularity offers an interesting avenue; it refers to "the smallest service unit that can be offered to a customer in itself or as a part of a service offering creating value perceived by the customer" (Rahikka et al, 2011, p. 358).…”
Section: Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%