Developing sustainable social programmes for rural ethnic seniors: perspectives of community stakeholders

Abstract

This qualitative study explores barriers to delivering sustainable rural community programmes to increase social participation among Australian ethnic seniors. In 2013, in-depth interviews were conducted with 14 stakeholders across eight rural/regional organisations that had received state government funding to provide social participation initiatives for ethnic seniors. Within interviews, participants were asked to outline factors that had enhanced or hindered their capacity to deliver the funded projects, and their plans for sustainability. Data were analysed thematically in accordance with Shediac-Rizkallah and Bone's (1998) tripartite programme sustainability framework (project design and implementation, organisational setting and broader community environment). Findings indicate that in the context of resource and staffing constraints and a lack of ethnic critical mass, programme sustainability reflected the increased capacity of rural ethnic seniors to integrate into existing community groups and maintain their own groups and activities. However, this is dependent on the ability of mainstream government, health and social care services to cater for diverse cultural needs and preferences, the ability of rural organisations to support ethnic seniors to manage their own cultural groups and activities, and the capacity of funding bodies, rural community and policy structures to maintain cultural sensitivity while compensating for the rural premium. In addition to identifying some key learnings for rural governments, health and community organisations, this research highlights the precarious nature of rural programme sustainability for ethnic seniors in the context of wider community, organisational and policy constraints.

The symbolic representation of community in social isolation and loneliness among older people: Insights for intervention from a rural Irish case study

“…Similarly, community homogeneity could explain non‐engagement by some in the socialising activities particularly by non‐indigenous members of the community. This mirrors the findings of an Australian study by Winterton and Hulme Chambers () that highlights some of challenges of developing inclusive social programmes for ethnic rural‐dwelling older people. Understanding community context can therefore elicit richer understanding of the target problem, inform the activities of intervention and explain varying levels of programme engagement by community members.…”

Making change last? Exploring the value of sustainability approaches in healthcare: a scoping review

“… United States Secondary Care 67. Winterton and Chambers [ 110 ] Conceptual Framework for Planning for Sustainability of Community-based Health Programs To explore barriers to delivering sustainable rural community programmes to increase social participation among Australian seniors Australia Community Care 68. Zakumumpa et al [ 111 ] Level of Institutionalisation Scale To identify facilitators and barriers to the long-term sustainability of antiretroviral therapy (ART) programs at six health facilities Uganda Primary Care …”

Community health promotion programs for older adults: What helps and hinders implementation

“…In addition, coordinators may vary in their years of experience, as in our study, and it seems essential to provide program coordinators with skills to deliver and adapt programs based on the needs of participants (ie, physical, cultural) and also, to foster attentive leaders that are responsive, nurturing, and connected to participants (ie, enthusiastic, encouraging, inclusive) . This also fosters sustained participation and enjoyment . Engaging older adults in the design of the program may prove fruitful in sustaining participation.…”

“…45 This also fosters sustained participation and enjoyment. 46 Engaging older adults in the design of the program 47 may prove fruitful in sustaining participation.…”