2020
DOI: 10.46328/ijres.v1i1.1096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing Students’ Reflective Thinking Skills in a Metacognitive and Argument-Driven Learning Environment

Abstract: This study designed and examined the effects of Metacognitive and Argument-Driven Learning Environment (MADLE) in cultivating students’ reflective thinking skills.  The study involved a group of third-year Biological Science Education students (n=23) in a state university in the Philippines. The study employed a mixed-method approach, where both quantitative and qualitative data were collected and analyzed to answer the research question. Specifically, one-group pretest-posttest design was used under the parad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Students with poor metacognition can benefit from metacognitive training to improve their metacognition and cognitive performance (Bogdanović et al, 2015). Metacognition is also associated with improved problem-solving and reflective thinking skills (Chen et al, 2018;Antonio, 2020). Other findings explain that if metacognitive training is conducted continuously over a semester, it will likely improve students' ability to assess their test scores (Casselman & Atwood, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students with poor metacognition can benefit from metacognitive training to improve their metacognition and cognitive performance (Bogdanović et al, 2015). Metacognition is also associated with improved problem-solving and reflective thinking skills (Chen et al, 2018;Antonio, 2020). Other findings explain that if metacognitive training is conducted continuously over a semester, it will likely improve students' ability to assess their test scores (Casselman & Atwood, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%