Between 2011 and 2014, there were five times as many protests per annum in Africa as there had been in 2000. The majority of these protests were related to deteriorating economic conditions, poor service delivery, inadequate wages, and economic inequality. These protests, which we term "valence protests," do not fit easily into typical narratives about contentious behavior: they are neither social movements, nor revolutionary, nor a manifestation of organized laborinstead, many of these protests are a collective expression of a valence issue of which the government is well aware. We argue for a different conceptual framework for valence protests and contend that they are a way for politically engaged citizens to express their political preferences when voting is insufficient. Using Round 5 Afrobarometer data, we find empirical support for this claim. We also find that citizens more readily communicate political preferences through protest in countries governed by dominant parties. 1 This is not to say that incumbents know precisely what voters want. Even in developed democracies such as the US, incumbents are not always aware of what voters want, hence the use of polling. Rather, we argue that while African regimes are low information contexts generally (Posner 2005, Gottlieb 2016), governments throughout Africa are aware, for example, that education and health need improvement, that jobs are needed, and that people rely on a variety of price subsidies. This is to say that governments are generally aware that many key sectors need improvement.