Developing nurse‐sensitive outcomes in acute inpatient mental health settings—A systematic review

Abstract

BackgroundWhile nurse‐sensitive outcomes (NSOs) are well established in numerous health settings, to date there is no indicator suite of NSOs for inpatient mental health settings.AimTo assess the relationship between nursing variables and patient outcomes in acute inpatient mental health settings to determine which outcomes can be used as indicators of the quality of nursing care.MethodsDatabases accessed were CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and EMBASE, last searched in May 2022. The review followed the 2020 PRISMA checklist for systematic reviews. Papers published between 1995 and 2022, conducted in acute mental health care units were included. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool. A meta‐analysis was not possible because of the large number of variables and measurement inconsistencies.ResultsA total of 57 studies were reviewed. Studies were categorised according to whether they found a significant or non‐significant relationship between nurse variables and patient outcomes. Seven outcomes—aggression, seclusion, restraint, absconding, pro‐re‐nata medications, special observations and self‐harm—were identified. For each outcome, there were significant findings for several nurse variables indicating that all included outcomes could be used as NSOs. However, evidence for aggression, seclusion and restraint use as suitable NSOs was more robust than the evidence for self‐harm, absconding, pro‐re‐nata medications and special observations.ConclusionAll the seven outcomes can all be used to develop an NSO indicator suite in mental health inpatient settings. More work is needed to establish high‐quality studies to clearly demonstrate the relationship between these outcome measures and changes in nurse variables such as nurse staffing, skill mix, work environment, nurse education and nurse experience.Patient and Public ContributionPatient or public contribution was not possible because of the type of the variables being explored.

Factors associated with risk of falling among younger inpatients in a mental health setting—A systematic review

“…These results were unclear, and more studies are needed to draw these conclusions. A recent review of literature also recommended further studies to establish the role of staff related factors and their association with increased risks in mental health settings (Ngune et al, 2023). Our review also showed, there was contradictory evidence about time of falls with some studies indicating that late nights to early mornings (An et al, 2009; Seeherunwong et al, 2022) were risky times and other study daytime (Chan et al, 2013).…”

Contributions of representing the elements of nursing practice in the ISO 18.104:2023 standard: a theoretical study

“…The conclusion of both studies highlights the need to reach international consensus to guarantee minimum standards for actions or at least national guidelines. In mental health nursing, a systematic literature review assessed outcomes that could generate quality indicators, concluding that the studies were of variable quality and that the seven indicators proposed at the conclusion of the review should be integrated into administrative data ( 12 ) .…”

Solving the shortage of psychiatric – mental health nurses in acute inpatient care settings

“…Recent studies re‐examine the issue of violence in acute mental healthcare (Jenkins, Quigg, et al, 2022; Weltens et al, 2021) and it is essential that its occurrence and impact is reduced if inpatient units are to be satisfying places to work, as well as to receive care. Ngune et al (2023) highlight robust evidence for aggression, restraint use and seclusion to be regarded as nurse sensitive outcomes in acute mental health. We call for renewed focus on the monitoring of changes in nurse variables and their impact on client outcomes as well as staff retention.…”