2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1474-0346(02)00003-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing intelligent tensegrity structures with stochastic search

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is sometimes difficult to implement realtime control. Without case-base or any learning methods, it takes a relatively long time to give an effective solution in response to a new loading event (Shea et al, 2002;Smith, 2003;Fest et al, 2004). It is long even for quasi-static control, not to mention for real-time control.…”
Section: Motivation and Difficultymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is sometimes difficult to implement realtime control. Without case-base or any learning methods, it takes a relatively long time to give an effective solution in response to a new loading event (Shea et al, 2002;Smith, 2003;Fest et al, 2004). It is long even for quasi-static control, not to mention for real-time control.…”
Section: Motivation and Difficultymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adaptability to loads can sometimes be limited. In those model-based stochastic search procedures for the numerical FEM calculation, the load conditions have to be known or prescribed to the computer or the human controllers (the users) (Shea et al, 2002;Fest et al, 2003;, or at least the load has to be partially defined so that the load identification work can be done first (Adam and Smith, 2007a;. In situations where the only piece of information is the structural deformation (from totally unknown loads), the control task will be difficult.…”
Section: Motivation and Difficultymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first method simulates traditional design through parametric analyses, while the second uses a direct stochastic search called PGSL (Probabilistic Global Search Lausanne). PGSL is a stochastic sampling method for global optimization that has been shown to give better performance than other stochastic optimization methods for engineering tasks such as configuration, diagnosis and control [16,[18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%