Developing integrated health and social care services for older persons in Europe

Abstract

Purpose This paper is to distribute first results of the EU Fifth Framework Project ‘Providing integrated health and social care for older persons—issues, problems and solutions’ (PROCARE—http://www.euro.centre.org/procare/). The project's first phase was to identify different approaches to integration as well as structural, organisational, economic and social-cultural factors and actors that constitute integrated and sustainable care systems. It also served to retrieve a number of experiences, model ways of working and demonstration projects in the participating countries which are currently being analysed in order to learn from success—or failure—and to develop policy recommendations for the local, national and European level. Theory The paper draws on existing definitions of integrated care in various countries and by various scholars. Given the context of an international comparative study it tries to avoid providing a single, ready-made definition but underlines the role of social care as part and parcel of this type of integrated care in the participating countries. Methods The paper is based on national reports from researchers representing ten organisations (university institutes, consultancy firms, research institutes, the public and the NGO sector) from 9 European countries: Austria, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, and the UK. Literature reviews made intensive use of grey literature and evaluation studies in the context of at least five model ways of working in each country. Results As a result of the cross-national overview an attempt to classify different approaches and definitions is made and indicators of relative importance of the different instruments used in integrating health and social care services are provided. Conclusions The cross-national overview shows that issues concerning co-ordination and integration of services are high on the agenda in most countries. Depending on the state of service development, various approaches and instruments can be observed. Different national frameworks, in particular with respect to financing and organisation, systemic development, professionalisation and professional cultures, basic societal values (family ethics), and political approaches have to be taken into account during the second phase of PROCARE during which transversal and transnational analysis will be undertaken based on an in-depth analysis of two model ways of working in each country. Discussion Far from a European vision concerning integrated care, national health and social care systems remain—at best—loosely coupled systems that are facing increasing difficulties, given the current challenges, in particular in long-term care for older persons: increasing marketisation, lack of managerial knowledge (co-operation, co-ordination), shortage of care workers and a general trend toward...

Diagnostic study, design and implementation of an integrated model of care in France: a bottom-up process with continuous leadership

“…Strong fragmentations exist between medical services and social services, community-based and hospital-based services, healthcare professionals and family caregivers, as well as long-term and acute care [17]. Over the last 30 years, every top-down attempt at reorganizing services made by central authorities, has coordinated gerontology services and established networking in which professionals participate voluntarily [18]. These attempts featured no formalized collaboration, a lack of participation by professionals, and strong competition between care providers (no limitations on their areas of competency) which have reinforced fragmentations [19].…”

Long-term care hospitals in Turkey: a review

“…The LTC system in Europe differs from that in other nonEuropean countries and differences are also seen among European countries (15). Cash-for-care systems were first implemented in Europe in the 1970s and became widespread in the 1990s, and are programmers by which care services can be purchased according to the healthcare insurance premiums paid by an individual (16).…”

“…In some European countries, LTCHs are integrated within the healthcare system for post-acute care (PAC) and located in healthcare institutions (15,16). The LTC system in Europe differs from that in other nonEuropean countries and differences are also seen among European countries (15).…”

“…The rationale behind cash-for-care systems was that alternative healthcare services could be freely selected by the individual (16). As the financial costs of the hospital and care institutions were met by the patient's insurance, competition to provide the best service started between care institutions (15,16).…”

Integrated care facilitation for older patients with complex health care needs reduces hospital demand

“…Part of this problem is that many health care systems have fragmented geriatric services, discontinuities within the system of geriatric care, system inefficiencies and a community/hospital split. [1][2][3][4][5] In these systems, elderly patients may fail to receive all the services they require and, as a consequence, suffer detrimental impacts upon their health status and quality of life. Resulting from this are hospital presentations and a need for acute care, which could have been avoided.…”