2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.84.014105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing grain boundary diagrams as a materials science tool: A case study of nickel-doped molybdenum

Abstract: Impurity-based, premelting-like, grain boundary (GB) "phases" (complexions) can form in alloys and influence sintering, creep, and microstructural development. Calculation of Phase Diagrams (CalPhaD) methods and Miedema-type statistical interfacial thermodynamic models are combined to forecast the formation and stability of subsolidus quasiliquid GB phases in binary alloys. This work supports a long-range scientific goal of developing "GB (phase) diagrams" as a new materials science tool to help controlling th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
111
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
6
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The computed GB complexion (phase) diagram has been systematically validated with experiments, including direct AC STEM characterization (both previously reported data for specimens quenched from 700°C and 1100°C [29] and a new experiment on a specimen quenched from 1400°C) and an early AES study of GB segregation [32]. In addition to the earlier development GB λ-diagrams that can forecast the trends in GB disordering and related sintering behaviors at high temperatures [9,14,15,[17][18][19], this study constructed a more rigorous (yet simple) GB complexion diagram with well-defined transition lines that can be verified by experiments. Future research should be conducted to compute and validate other GB complexion diagrams to realize a potentially-transformative scientific goal of systematically constructing GB complexion diagrams as a new materials science tool.…”
Section: Contents Lists Available At Sciencedirectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The computed GB complexion (phase) diagram has been systematically validated with experiments, including direct AC STEM characterization (both previously reported data for specimens quenched from 700°C and 1100°C [29] and a new experiment on a specimen quenched from 1400°C) and an early AES study of GB segregation [32]. In addition to the earlier development GB λ-diagrams that can forecast the trends in GB disordering and related sintering behaviors at high temperatures [9,14,15,[17][18][19], this study constructed a more rigorous (yet simple) GB complexion diagram with well-defined transition lines that can be verified by experiments. Future research should be conducted to compute and validate other GB complexion diagrams to realize a potentially-transformative scientific goal of systematically constructing GB complexion diagrams as a new materials science tool.…”
Section: Contents Lists Available At Sciencedirectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the free-energy functions of bulk phases, different functions of γ GB can be written for different GB complexions and their intersections define GB transitions, e.g., the occurrence of a premelting transition from one complexion with low S xs to another complexion with high S xs with increasing temperature or an adsorption transition from one complexion with low Γ to another complexion with high Γ with increasing chemical potential difference. In this study, we focus on modeling GB adsorption (vs. prior studies [9,10,[13][14][15] that forecasted interfacial disordering).…”
Section: Contents Lists Available At Sciencedirectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Efforts to estimate the composition dependent interfacial energies for a given set of solid phases were reviewed by Costae Silva et al [103], who noted that while thermodynamic approaches can provide reasonable estimates, fundamental firstprinciples approaches [104] should be used as the reference values. More recently, Shi and Luo [105] developed a method to estimate the interfacial energy associated with a grain boundary between two phases. Combining these and other methods with data available from coarsening experiments [106,107] and single-sensor DTA nucleation cooling experiments [101] a CALPHAD based databases could be established, where the interfacial energies are defined by two phases.…”
Section: Interphase Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%