2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00366-017-0544-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing GPR model for forecasting the rock fragmentation in surface mines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent applications of deep learning in blasting include the prediction of flyrock [157], rock fragment distribution [176], and classification of mine seismic events, among others. Further, we observed that most common ML algorithms for blastinduced fragment size predictions include the ANN [159][160][161][162], SVM [104,177], PCA [177], fuzzy inference system [178][179][180], adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system [177,181,182], bee colony algorithm [162], PSO [183,184], ant colony optimization [185], and gaussian process regression [186]. The ML-based fragment size prediction models performed significantly better than the empirical models [187].…”
Section: Discussion and Future Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent applications of deep learning in blasting include the prediction of flyrock [157], rock fragment distribution [176], and classification of mine seismic events, among others. Further, we observed that most common ML algorithms for blastinduced fragment size predictions include the ANN [159][160][161][162], SVM [104,177], PCA [177], fuzzy inference system [178][179][180], adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system [177,181,182], bee colony algorithm [162], PSO [183,184], ant colony optimization [185], and gaussian process regression [186]. The ML-based fragment size prediction models performed significantly better than the empirical models [187].…”
Section: Discussion and Future Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is approach can simply solve complicated problems. Nonlinear GPR techniques may be employed using small training datasets and integrate new evidence as the data points rise in number [48]. Overfitting is avoided to a great extent as optimization includes fewer hyperparameters in the training phase.…”
Section: Gpr Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The symbol represents the gamma function and x, y are positive parameters, and the adjusted K v is the Bessel function [46].…”
Section: Train Outputmentioning
confidence: 99%