2011
DOI: 10.6113/jpe.2011.11.1.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing Function Models of Back-to-Back PWM Converters for Simplified Simulation

Abstract: In this paper, a function model of back-to-back PWM converters, based on the switching function, is developed for simplified simulation of power electronic application systems. For the function model, the PWM power switches are represented by dependent power sources. By using the proposed function model, the computer memory and the run time required for the simulation of power circuits can be significantly reduced. It is shown that the simulation results generated from the function models are almost the same a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the configurations that uses a back to back converter as in the conceptual schematics 3 and 4, two control topologies is considered where a resonant controller is taken into consideration to regulate the overall voltage at the output of the transformer [15], and the dq transformation technique is used to control the voltage at the DC link terminals [16], whereby the overall controller adds or decrease voltage (20% -30%) to/from the total output voltage in order to control the whole output voltage of the transformer. The total output voltage control for the output of the transformer is explained as the following:…”
Section: Control Topologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the configurations that uses a back to back converter as in the conceptual schematics 3 and 4, two control topologies is considered where a resonant controller is taken into consideration to regulate the overall voltage at the output of the transformer [15], and the dq transformation technique is used to control the voltage at the DC link terminals [16], whereby the overall controller adds or decrease voltage (20% -30%) to/from the total output voltage in order to control the whole output voltage of the transformer. The total output voltage control for the output of the transformer is explained as the following:…”
Section: Control Topologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capability of each configuration is summarised in Table 1. V. CONTROL TOPOLOGY A resonant controller is taken into consideration to track a sinusoidal wave reference beside the need of controlling specific harmonic orders for a resistive load. Also, the dq transformation technique is used to control the voltage at the DC link terminals [12], whereby the overall controller adds or decrease voltage (10% -20%) to/from the total output voltage in order to control the whole output voltage of the transformer. The transformer supports a part of supplied voltage and the PE converter controls the other part of the voltage (voltage variations).…”
Section: Three Windings Transformermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A vector control is one of the most popular methods used for voltage source converter (VSC) [12]. Control structure of the VSC in the DC side [13] Voltage and currents are described as vectors in the stationary αβ and transformed after that to dq coordinates to be controlled by two loops: inner loop for the current control and outer loop for the DC voltage control.…”
Section: A Dc-link Vector Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the flicker calculation requires a long simulation time (10 minutes for the short-term flicker), it is inconvenient to use the actual model of power switches for the flicker investigation in the wind power systems. So, the back-to-back PWM converters using actual switching power devices can be replaced by the function model which consists of the controlled-current sources and the controlled-voltage sources [19]. With this function model, the simulation executing time for the flicker analysis in DFIG wind turbine systems is significantly reduced by about 80%.…”
Section: Model Of Wind Turbine Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%