2013
DOI: 10.2196/ijmr.2346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing Electronic Cooperation Tools: A Case From Norwegian Health Care

Abstract: BackgroundMany countries aim to create electronic cooperational tools in health care, but the progress is rather slow.ObjectiveThe study aimed to uncover how the authoritys’ financing policies influence the development of electronic cooperational tools within public health care.MethodsAn interpretative approach was used in this study. We performed 30 semistructured interviews with vendors, policy makers, and public authorities. Additionally, we conducted an extensive documentation study and participated in 18 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course, the mentioned obstacles call for regulatory politics that meanwhile also in Germany try to accelerate the nation-wide introduction of electronic patient records. In centralized one-payer systems such as the British National Health Service, this is easier than in fragmented market-oriented systems such as the United States, Switzerland, or Norway [122]. In Germany, the development is incumbent upon self-administration systems, i. e. representation of the service providers and cost bearers, that try in an extremely long negotiation process to achieve a balance of the interests in a common approach.…”
Section: Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, the mentioned obstacles call for regulatory politics that meanwhile also in Germany try to accelerate the nation-wide introduction of electronic patient records. In centralized one-payer systems such as the British National Health Service, this is easier than in fragmented market-oriented systems such as the United States, Switzerland, or Norway [122]. In Germany, the development is incumbent upon self-administration systems, i. e. representation of the service providers and cost bearers, that try in an extremely long negotiation process to achieve a balance of the interests in a common approach.…”
Section: Stagementioning
confidence: 99%