2010
DOI: 10.1598/rrq.45.1.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing Early Literacy Skills: A Meta‐Analysis of Alphabet Learning and Instruction

Abstract: Alphabet knowledge is a hallmark of early literacy and facilitating its development has become a primary objective of pre-school instruction and intervention. However, little agreement exists about how to promote the development of alphabet knowledge effectively. A meta-analysis of the effects of instruction on alphabet outcomes demonstrated that instructional impacts differed by type of alphabet outcome examined and content of instruction provided. School-based instruction yielded larger effects than home-bas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
173
0
9

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(74 reference statements)
7
173
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Effect sizes of this magnitude, typically described as in the small to medium range (Cohen, 1988), are common in educational research (corresponding, for example, to correlation values of 0.2 or less), and especially in intervention research. For example, a recently published meta-analysis that synthesized more than 60 treatmentcontrol studies of interventions designed to teach alphabet learning to young children found effect sizes similar to those in the current report (Piasta & Wagner, 2010), with standardized mean effect sizes ranging from d = 0.14 to d = 0.65, in the small to medium range. However, as the authors of the meta-analysis note, these relatively small statistical effects nevertheless represent meaningful advancements beyond the status quo in instruction.…”
Section: Small But Significant Differencessupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Effect sizes of this magnitude, typically described as in the small to medium range (Cohen, 1988), are common in educational research (corresponding, for example, to correlation values of 0.2 or less), and especially in intervention research. For example, a recently published meta-analysis that synthesized more than 60 treatmentcontrol studies of interventions designed to teach alphabet learning to young children found effect sizes similar to those in the current report (Piasta & Wagner, 2010), with standardized mean effect sizes ranging from d = 0.14 to d = 0.65, in the small to medium range. However, as the authors of the meta-analysis note, these relatively small statistical effects nevertheless represent meaningful advancements beyond the status quo in instruction.…”
Section: Small But Significant Differencessupporting
confidence: 76%
“…These first steps involve a) letter naming, b) phonics, and c) phonemic awareness approaches [8] [29] [58]. This literature review section presents data on these three main beginning reading approaches.…”
Section: Research On Letter and Letter-sound Teaching Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the United States letter name instruction remains a first step in teaching children to read [1] [8] [29] [58]. State curriculum standards throughout the nation require children to look at letters, often starting with capitals, to learn to name letters [59].…”
Section: Letter Naming Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the data obtained in the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study the factor that best predicts the academic success of children is related to the learning of letters [21]. The knowledge of the alphabet is a feature of literacy and the main objective of preschool teaching and early educative intervention is to facilitate its development [22]. A study in 2005 with 256 preschool children proved that an intervention program increases phonological awareness, because Evaluation Test of Phonological Awareness results indicate a growth of the phonological awareness levels after the post-test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%