2022
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1741482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing Dashboards to Address Children's Health Disparities in Ohio

Abstract: Objectives Social determinants of health (SDoH) can be measured at the geographic level to convey information about neighborhood deprivation. The Ohio Children's Opportunity Index (OCOI) is a composite area-level opportunity index comprised of eight health domains. Our research team has documented the design, development, and use cases of a dashboard solution to visualize OCOI. Methods The OCOI is a multidomain index spanning the following eight domains: (1) family stability, (2) infant health, (3) c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim of these interviews was to systematically collect feedback about the prototypes using a deductive approach based on our prior work on decision support tools where we categorized identified themes into one of three categories: (1) function, issues that are related to meaningful and intuitive navigation of an application; (2) content, problems with information provided in an application that complicates or leads to misinterpretation of information; and (3) aesthetics, concerns that impede an application from having a minimalist design that effectively communicates information. 49 , 50 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of these interviews was to systematically collect feedback about the prototypes using a deductive approach based on our prior work on decision support tools where we categorized identified themes into one of three categories: (1) function, issues that are related to meaningful and intuitive navigation of an application; (2) content, problems with information provided in an application that complicates or leads to misinterpretation of information; and (3) aesthetics, concerns that impede an application from having a minimalist design that effectively communicates information. 49 , 50 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conducted usability testing and think-aloud sessions with patients and providers. The aim of these interviews was to systematically collect feedback about the prototypes using a deductive approach based on our prior work on decision support tools [47,48]. We categorized identified themes into one of three categories: (1) function, issues that are related to meaningful and intuitive navigation of an application; (2) content, problems with information provided in an application that complicate or lead to misinterpretation of information; and (3) aesthetics, concerns that impede an application from having a minimalist design that effectively communicates information.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%