2000
DOI: 10.1108/00400910010378467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing cross‐cultural capability in undergraduate business education: implications for the student experience

Abstract: Draws on relevant academic literature to explore the nature of cross‐cultural capability and goes on to consider its implications for the student experience in British undergraduate business education. Some of the key issues concerning the design of mechanisms and strategies for integrating cross‐cultural capability within the curriculum are highlighted and discussed with a view to informing what needs to be done to prepare undergraduates for the international business world of tomorrow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, curriculum internationalization is a multidimensional concept that can be defined and, therefore, approached in several ways. Some universities adopt a pragmatic approach, seeking to gain or entrench advantage in a competitive environment through offering a curriculum relevant to a larger number of students worldwide, or developing competencies that allow graduates to operate in an international environment (Laughton & Ottewill, 2000;Whalley, 1997). An ideological approach may prevail where it is important to prepare graduates with lifelong learning skills for the largely unknown but increasingly inter-related future world.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, curriculum internationalization is a multidimensional concept that can be defined and, therefore, approached in several ways. Some universities adopt a pragmatic approach, seeking to gain or entrench advantage in a competitive environment through offering a curriculum relevant to a larger number of students worldwide, or developing competencies that allow graduates to operate in an international environment (Laughton & Ottewill, 2000;Whalley, 1997). An ideological approach may prevail where it is important to prepare graduates with lifelong learning skills for the largely unknown but increasingly inter-related future world.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field is well-grounded in theoretical literature. Authors such as Hall (1959Hall ( , 1966, Hall and Hall, (1990), Hofstede (1980Hofstede ( , 1991, Trompenaars (1993, with Hampden-Turner, 2000, Holden (2004), and Spencer-Oatey and Franklin (2009), among others, have developed considerably our understanding of crosscultural issues in international marketing and business as has the Globe study by House et al, 2004. Research and findings from these and other authors have been synthesized in articles on how to enhance the IB/marketing curriculum and in international marketing textbooks and classroom resources (Witte, 2010;Clark, Flaherty, Wright, & McMillen, 2009;Prestwich & Ho-Kim, 2007;Ramburuth & Welch, 2005;Cant, 2004;Jones, 2003;Laughton & Ottewill, 2000;Moran, Braaten, & Walsh, 1994;Serrie, 1992). Consequently, unlike the political environment as we will see below, there is a rich source of material for both curriculum designers and for students on international marketing and business programs to draw from (e.g., Penaloza, Toulouse & Visconti, 2011;de Mooij, 2009;Nakata, 2009;Usunier & Lee, 2009;Burton, 2008;Trompenaars & Woolliams;Gesteland, 2002;Rugimbana & Nwanko, 2002).…”
Section: Embedding Culture and Cross-cultural Understanding Into The mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Cultural distance has received a great deal of attention in international business literature (Dow, 2000;Evans and Malvando, 2002;Kogut and Singh, 1988;O'Grady and Henry, 1996). When applied to marketing education, the premise is that different countries can be grouped according to the homogeneity and heterogeneity in their teaching and learning culture (Wierstra et al, 2003), with Hofstede's cultural dimensions providing a relevant framework for cross-cultural research in marketing education (Hofstede, 1986;Hofstede and Bond, 1988;Laughton and Ottewill, 2000;Maehr et al, 1999;Zhang et al, 2008). Of Hofstede's (1986) four cultural dimensions (power distance, uncertainty avoidance, individualism/collectivism, masculinity/femininity), two distinct teaching culture dimensions can be distinguished -power distance and uncertainty avoidance.…”
Section: Cultural Distancementioning
confidence: 99%