Developing classification indices for Chinese pulse diagnosis

Abstract

Summary Aim:To develop classification criteria for Chinese pulse diagnosis and to objectify the ancient diagnostic technique. Methods:Chinese pulse curves are treated as wave signals. Multidimensional variable analysis is performed to provide the best curve fit between the recorded Chinese pulse waveforms and the collective Gamma density functions. Results:Chinese pulses can be recognized quantitatively by the newly-developed four classification indices, that is, the wave length, the relative phase difference, the rate parameter, and the peak ratio. The new quantitative classification not only reduces the dependency of pulse diagnosis on Chinese physician's experience, but also is able to interpret pathological wrist-pulse waveforms more precisely. Conclusions:Traditionally, Chinese physicians use fingertips to feel the wrist-pulses of patients in order to determine their health conditions. The qualitative theory of the Chinese pulse diagnosis is based on the experience of Chinese physicians for thousands of years. However, there are no quantitative theories to relate these different wrist-pulse waveforms to the health conditions of patients. In this paper, new quantified classification indices have been introduced to interpret the Chinese pulse waveform patterns objectively.

Relationships of Pulse Waveform Parameters to Mood States and Chronic Fatigue

“…This problem may be overcome by the use of pulse waveform parameters (PWPs). 3 Sequential ejections of blood from the left ventricle to the aorta generate a pulsatile wave in the arterial wall and consequent changes in blood pressure (BP) or volume that correspond to radial pulse pressure waveform (RPPW) or fingertip photoplethysmography (PTG). Although RPPW and PTG differ in their detection positions, it is generally accepted that the clinical utility of the PTG corresponds to that of the RPPW.…”

Development of the Quantitative Indicator of Abdominal Examination for Clinical Application: A Pilot Study

“…For decades, TKM experts have attempted to standardize various TKM diagnostic methods through clinical trials. [4][5][6] As a result, validated tools such as questionnaires for Qi stagnation 4 and yin-deficiency, 5 tongue diagnostic device, 6 iridology, 7 and pulse diagnostic classification 8 were developed. However, standardization and quantification of AE have not been performed before.…”

BCQ+: A Body Constitution Questionnaire to Assess Yang-Xu

“…The abovementioned method has been criticised for its lack of objectivity and inter-rater reliability [27][28][29]. Although efforts have been made to use some approaches, including standardisation of TCM terms, utilisation of diagnostic means, and the development of diagnostic questionnaires [12,[30][31][32][33][34], there are still no objective and validated instruments available for clinical studies.…”