2006
DOI: 10.4088/jcp.v67n1007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing Brief Scales for Use in Clinical Practice: The Reliability and Validity of Single-Item Self-Report Measures of Depression Symptom Severity, Psychosocial Impairment Due to Depression, and Quality of Life

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
160
0
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
160
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The study also employed single-item measures to capture depression and perceived powerlessness, while other studies have more commonly used scale instruments to measure them. However, a number of studies have illustrated the validity of single item measures to assess feelings of depression and powerlessness (Ayalon et al, 2009;Hoeppner et al, 2011;Rosenzveig et al, 2014;Veldhuizen et al, 2014;Zimmerman et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study also employed single-item measures to capture depression and perceived powerlessness, while other studies have more commonly used scale instruments to measure them. However, a number of studies have illustrated the validity of single item measures to assess feelings of depression and powerlessness (Ayalon et al, 2009;Hoeppner et al, 2011;Rosenzveig et al, 2014;Veldhuizen et al, 2014;Zimmerman et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars who have measured other constructs by use of a single item indicator have found these brief instruments to be valid and reliable (e.g., quality of life, depression, self-esteem). For example, single item indicators were found to have strong test-retest reliability and to be comparable to multiple item indicators (e.g., convergent validity, predictive power; Andrews and Withey 1976;Robins et al 2001;Zimmerman et al 2006).…”
Section: Physical Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next three measures were single items. It is rather unconventional to apply single-item variables, but single items have been shown to yield reliable and valid data and predict outcomes effectively in certain conditions [42][43][44][45]. They even might be more economical and suitable than multiple item measures [46][47][48].…”
Section: Liking Math At School Context and Liking Math At Exhibitionmentioning
confidence: 99%