2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00338-021-02127-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing best practices for the restoration of massive corals and the mitigation of predation impacts: influences of physical protection, colony size, and genotype on outplant mortality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, outplanting of nursery corals throughout the Caribbean and particularly in Florida, initially focused on acroporid corals per their conservation status and the implementation of species recovery plans (National Marine Fisheries Service, 2015) in addition to their fast growth and contribution to reef structure, yet high mortality rates occur a few years after outplanting (Ware et al, 2020;van Woesik et al, 2021). For massive species, outplanting has been bottlenecked due to stony coral tissue loss disease (Aeby et al, 2019), size-and tissue-selection predation risk (Rivas et al, 2021), and slow growth despite advances in microfragmentation (Forsman et al, 2015;Page et al, 2018). The success of outplanted corals reared from in situ and ex situ nurseries often have mixed results due to variable performance of outplants (Lirman et al, 2014), as some reef sites have unfavorable water quality (Muehllehner et al, 2016) or high levels of coral predators (Schopmeyer and Lirman, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, outplanting of nursery corals throughout the Caribbean and particularly in Florida, initially focused on acroporid corals per their conservation status and the implementation of species recovery plans (National Marine Fisheries Service, 2015) in addition to their fast growth and contribution to reef structure, yet high mortality rates occur a few years after outplanting (Ware et al, 2020;van Woesik et al, 2021). For massive species, outplanting has been bottlenecked due to stony coral tissue loss disease (Aeby et al, 2019), size-and tissue-selection predation risk (Rivas et al, 2021), and slow growth despite advances in microfragmentation (Forsman et al, 2015;Page et al, 2018). The success of outplanted corals reared from in situ and ex situ nurseries often have mixed results due to variable performance of outplants (Lirman et al, 2014), as some reef sites have unfavorable water quality (Muehllehner et al, 2016) or high levels of coral predators (Schopmeyer and Lirman, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite local challenges associated with coral outplanting success, it is imperative to understand the responses of nursery-reared coral to the major threats owing to coral reef decline -OW and OA -and investigate which coral species and/or individual genotypes are resistant to these stressors to aid in effective ecological restoration of FCR. Although massive coral species outplanting projects are lagging that of acroporids (Forsman et al, 2015;Page et al, 2018;Aeby et al, 2019;Rivas et al, 2021), this provides a window of opportunity to screen the vast biomass of restoration broodstock to understand phenotypic response and resistance to environmental stressors persistent along FCR that are likely to increase in frequency and severity (Manzello, 2015). Since 2016, Mote Marine Laboratory's (MML) Coral Health and Disease Program has conducted long-term experimental exposures using end-of-century ocean warming and acidification scenarios on their nursery broodstock coral species to understand physiological responses to such stressors, which ultimately influences long-term survival after outplanting at restoration reef sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this knowledge gap, we conducted paired ex-situ transmission and in-situ intervention experiments, and examined whole-transcriptome gene expression patterns of corals in response to disease exposure and antibiotic treatment, respectively. These experiments focused on the coral species M. cavernosa and O. faveolata due to their ongoing use in field-based disease intervention and monitoring efforts (Shilling et al, 2021;Walker et al, 2021), ecological importance as primary reef-builders (González-Barrios & Álvarez-Filip, 2018;Walton et al, 2018), and growing use in reef restoration (Koval et al, 2020;Rivas et al, 2021). Through these experiments, we 1) identified transcriptomic responses to SCTLD exposure in a controlled lab setting, 2) compared responses to disease exposure between species, 3) examined transcriptomic modulation following antibiotic treatment in a field-based time series, and 4) compared trends between diseased and treated corals in lab and field settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this knowledge gap, we conducted paired ex‐situ transmission and in‐situ intervention experiments and examined whole‐transcriptome gene expression patterns of corals in response to disease exposure and antibiotic treatment, respectively. These experiments focused on the coral species Montastraea cavernosa and Orbicella faveolata due to their ongoing use in field‐based disease intervention and monitoring efforts (Shilling et al, 2021; Walker et al, 2021), ecological importance as primary reef‐builders (González‐Barrios & Álvarez‐Filip, 2018; Walton et al, 2018), and growing use in reef restoration (Koval et al, 2020; Rivas et al, 2021). Through these experiments, we (1) identified transcriptomic responses to SCTLD exposure in a controlled lab setting, (2) compared responses to disease exposure between species, (3) examined transcriptomic modulation following antibiotic treatment in a field‐based time series and (4) compared trends between diseased and treated corals in lab and field settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These experiments focused on the coral species Montastraea cavernosa and Orbicella faveolata due to their ongoing use in field-based disease intervention and monitoring efforts (Shilling et al, 2021;Walker et al, 2021), ecological importance as primary reef-builders (González-Barrios & Álvarez-Filip, 2018;Walton et al, 2018), and growing use in reef restoration (Koval et al, 2020;Rivas et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%