2016
DOI: 10.1515/bpasts-2016-0071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing automatic recognition system of drill wear in standard laminated chipboard drilling process

Abstract: Abstract. The paper presents an automatic approach to recognition of the drill condition in a standard laminated chipboard drilling process. The state of the drill is classified into two classes: "useful" (sharp enough) and "useless" (worn out). The case "useless" indicates symptoms of excessive drill wear, unsatisfactory from the point of view of furniture processing quality. On the other hand the "useful" state identifies tools which are still able to drill holes acceptable due to the required processing qua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple steps require high levels of precision. At the same times, poor or ill-timed decisions about tool maintenance and/or exchange can result in a faulty product, not meeting the overall requirements and cause potential loss for the manufacturing company [Hu et al, 2019, Jegorowa et al, 2021, Kurek et al, 2019a, Osowski et al, 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple steps require high levels of precision. At the same times, poor or ill-timed decisions about tool maintenance and/or exchange can result in a faulty product, not meeting the overall requirements and cause potential loss for the manufacturing company [Hu et al, 2019, Jegorowa et al, 2021, Kurek et al, 2019a, Osowski et al, 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the main focus may include evaluating the state of elements without interrupting the actual manufacturing process, as presented in [ 1 ]. Most basic and commonly used approaches, such as the one presented in [ 2 ], measure different signals, such as vibration, noise, acoustic emission, cutting torque, feed force, and others, in order to evaluate the tool state. Similar approaches were used in [ 3 ], where data were extracted both from signal and frequency domains, along with wavelet coefficients, all in order to evaluate the obtained elements automatically, checking how relevant each item was to the selected problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The judgement of the state of a drill is not simple, and relying only on an expert’s eye would be quite risky. A traditional approach to this problem is collecting and measuring multiple signals produced by the drill, like the feed force, the cutting torque, the noise, the vibration, or the acoustic emission and then estimating its quality based on these signals [ 1 ]. This approach gives acceptably accurate results, as it was shown in previous works [ 2 , 3 , 4 ], but it requires the usage of multiple sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach gives acceptably accurate results, as it was shown in previous works [ 2 , 3 , 4 ], but it requires the usage of multiple sensors. Many pre-processing operations have to be performed on collected data, such as calculating a number of statistical parameters of recorded signals or generating Fourier representations for specific feature selection [ 1 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%