Developing attributes and attribute-levels for a discrete choice experiment on micro health insurance in rural Malawi

Abstract

BackgroundDiscrete choice experiments (DCEs) are attribute-driven experimental techniques used to elicit stakeholders’ preferences to support the design and implementation of policy interventions. The validity of a DCE, therefore, depends on the appropriate specification of the attributes and their levels. There have been recent calls for greater rigor in implementing and reporting on the processes of developing attributes and attribute-levels for discrete choice experiments (DCEs). This paper responds to such calls by carefully reporting a systematic process of developing micro health insurance attributes and attribute-levels for the design of a DCE in rural Malawi.MethodsConceptual attributes and attribute-levels were initially derived from a literature review which informed the design of qualitative data collection tools to identify context specific attributes and attribute-levels. Qualitative data was collected in August-September 2012 from 12 focus group discussions with community residents and 8 in-depth interviews with health workers. All participants were selected according to stratified purposive sampling. The material was tape-recorded, fully transcribed, and coded by three researchers to identify context-specific attributes and attribute-levels. Expert opinion was used to scale down the attributes and levels. A pilot study confirmed the appropriateness of the selected attributes and levels for a DCE.ResultsFirst, a consensus, emerging from an individual level analysis of the qualitative transcripts, identified 10 candidate attributes. Levels were assigned to all attributes based on data from transcripts and knowledge of the Malawian context, derived from literature. Second, through further discussions with experts, four attributes were discarded based on multiple criteria. The 6 remaining attributes were: premium level, unit of enrollment, management structure, health service benefit package, transportation coverage and copayment levels. A final step of revision and piloting confirmed that the retained attributes satisfied the credibility criteria of DCE attributes.ConclusionThis detailed description makes our attribute development process transparent, and provides the reader with a basis to assess the rigor of this stage of constructing the DCE. This paper contributes empirical evidence to the limited methodological literature on attributes and levels development for DCE, thereby providing further empirical guidance on the matter, specifically within rural communities of low- and middle-income countries.

Factors that influence variation in clinical decision-making about thrombolysis in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke: results of a discrete choice experiment

“…A well-designed DCE has been described as 'one that has sufficiently rich set of attributes and choice contexts, together with enough variation in the factor levels necessary to produce meaningful behavioural responses'. 27 Abiiro et al 85 advise employing quantitative methods, such as ranking exercises, to support the process of selecting factors for inclusion to a manageable number. In the first instance, the expert multidisciplinary panel in the current study (consisting of three stroke physicians who undertake clinical research, a trainee stroke physician, two patient representatives, two health psychologists, two health economists and an expert in shared decision-making) screened the list of factors in terms of whether they would be feasible or meaningful to include in a DCE, to be further scrutinised using a structured prioritisation exercise (SPE).…”

Investigation of attributes which guide choice in cataract surgery services in urban Sydney, Australia

“…This study employed a multi‐stage attribute development methodology incorporating a literature review, semi‐structured interviews and a review panel. A flow‐chart outlining this process is presented in Figure .…”

“…In a DCE, the time taken to choose each preferred scenario and the cognitive burden placed on participants is a product of the number of attributes and their levels. Alongside such design considerations, the review panel sought to limit attributes and their levels to the smallest valid number to reduce the participant cognitive burden . They also ensured that the terminology used to describe the attributes and attribute levels were realistic, policy‐relevant and understandable (that is, written in simple language consistent with that used by the participants).…”

Economic analysis of technological innovations to improve sustainability of pangasius production in Vietnam

“…In the fourth step, we defined the final list of attributes. We followed the recommendation of Abiiro et al (2014), i.e. a relatively low number of attributes keeps the number of choice cards manageable for respondents.…”

“…The validity of a choice experiment depends on the appropriate specification of the attributes and their levels (Abiiro et al 2014). Therefore, a systematic process of developing and selecting the final short-list of attributes about RAS adoption was designed.…”