2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2021.11.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing and validating natural language processing algorithms for radiology reports compared to ICD-10 codes for identifying venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Again, they report highly specific results but limited sensitivity, in line with our findings (74.83% (95% CI, 67.01 to 81.62) and 75.24% (95% CI, 65.86 to 83.14) for PE and DVT, respectively) 21. Verma et al report using natural language processing algorithms for digital interrogation of radiology reports in a large cohort of hospitalised medical patients to identify VTE outcomes 19. The authors conclude a high level of accuracy, reporting sensitivities of 94%/91% and PPVs of 90%/89% for DVT and PE, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Again, they report highly specific results but limited sensitivity, in line with our findings (74.83% (95% CI, 67.01 to 81.62) and 75.24% (95% CI, 65.86 to 83.14) for PE and DVT, respectively) 21. Verma et al report using natural language processing algorithms for digital interrogation of radiology reports in a large cohort of hospitalised medical patients to identify VTE outcomes 19. The authors conclude a high level of accuracy, reporting sensitivities of 94%/91% and PPVs of 90%/89% for DVT and PE, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“… 21 Verma et al report using natural language processing algorithms for digital interrogation of radiology reports in a large cohort of hospitalised medical patients to identify VTE outcomes. 19 The authors conclude a high level of accuracy, reporting sensitivities of 94%/91% and PPVs of 90%/89% for DVT and PE, respectively. Finally, Klil-Drori et al have recently validated an algorithm for confirmation of suspected PE, combining emergency department diagnosis coding, imaging coding and dispensed prescription or hospital treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The positive predictive value of ICD coding for VTE has previously been validated. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] thrombosis), and intra-thoracic thrombosis (superior vena cava, brachiocephalic, other unspecified thoracic veins). In instances of multiple entries, the initial occurrence of VTE was utilized.…”
Section: Study Design and Patient Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%