2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing and validating a stress appraisal measure for minority adolescents

Abstract: Although there are a number of measures designed to assess the cognitive appraisal of stress in adult populations, currently there are no measures that are specifically designed to assess this important construct in adolescents. To overcome this limitation, the factorial validity and dimensionality of a dispositional measure of stress appraisal was examined in the current study. Using a multiethnic adolescent sample, both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses resulted in a three‐factor representation of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
1
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
51
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps reflecting these concerns, researchers have developed several measures of cognitive appraisal. Such instruments include semantic differential assessment of potentially stressful appraisals [29]; Peacock and Wong's Stress Appraisal Measures (SAM) [30] for adults and Stress Appraisal Measure for Adolescents (SAMA) [31]; the Appraisal of Life Events Scale (ALE) [32]; the Stress Appraisal Inventory for Life Situations (SAILS) [33]; and the Cognitive Appraisal Scale (CAS) [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps reflecting these concerns, researchers have developed several measures of cognitive appraisal. Such instruments include semantic differential assessment of potentially stressful appraisals [29]; Peacock and Wong's Stress Appraisal Measures (SAM) [30] for adults and Stress Appraisal Measure for Adolescents (SAMA) [31]; the Appraisal of Life Events Scale (ALE) [32]; the Stress Appraisal Inventory for Life Situations (SAILS) [33]; and the Cognitive Appraisal Scale (CAS) [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expectancies are important here, with several studies indicating that those with low self-esteem respond more negatively to experiences of failure while those with higher self-esteem, are more likely to persist in the face of difficulties (see Tafarodi and Vu 1997, for discussion). In this respect, one can see links with the literature on stress, where appraisals of confidence and efficacy relate to an individual's ability to cope with stressors (see for example, Lazarus 1999; Rowley et al 2005). Essentially, someone with a low selfesteem believes he or she has less in the way of resources to cope with these threats and challenges, and is consequently more vulnerable (Baumeister 1993).…”
Section: Self-esteem and Transitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Der Global Score des STAI war nach dem Lesen der beiden Szenarien signifikant höher als zuvor. Studien als wenig stabil erwies[32,33]. So zeigte sich in einer Studie von Peacock und Wong [6] wie bereits beschrieben eine fünfund in einer weiteren eine sechsfaktorielle Lösung.…”
unclassified