2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2005.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing and refining interventions in persons with health disparities: The use of Qualitative Description

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
424
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 460 publications
(443 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
424
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These two investigators then met to discuss the condensed summaries and ascertain that the core of the responses was preserved [12]. Summaries were then analyzed using both manifest and latent content analysis techniques to search for commonalities and differences among responses [13,14]. Each researcher identified main themes (latent content) and categories (manifest content) for each question, and then combined findings from the questions to identify common themes and categories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two investigators then met to discuss the condensed summaries and ascertain that the core of the responses was preserved [12]. Summaries were then analyzed using both manifest and latent content analysis techniques to search for commonalities and differences among responses [13,14]. Each researcher identified main themes (latent content) and categories (manifest content) for each question, and then combined findings from the questions to identify common themes and categories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative descriptive methods (Sandelowski, 2000;Sullivan-Bolyai, Bova, & Harper, 2005) and qualitative content analysis were used to analyze the study participants' responses to the semi-structured interview questions (within and across data) related to HIV and HCV symptomatology. Interview data were coded by developing descriptive codes (Miles & Huberman, 1994) that categorized text into themes or categories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This methodology has been identified as being useful to inform intervention development (Sandelowski 2000, Sullivan-Bolyai et al 2005. Ethics approval was obtained from AUT Ethics Committee (14/154) and institutional approval was gained from Auckland District Health Board Ethics Committee prior to commencing this study.…”
Section: Methods Designmentioning
confidence: 99%