2016
DOI: 10.1590/1679-78252797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing and Multi-Objective Optimization of a Combined Energy Absorber Structure Using Polynomial Neural Networks and Evolutionary Algorithms

Abstract: In this study a newly developed thin-walled structure with the combination of circular and square sections is investigated in term of crashworthiness. The results of the experimental tests are utilized to validate the Abaqus/Explicit TM finite element simulations and analysis of the crush phenomenon. Three polynomial metamodels based on the evolved group method of data handling (GMDH) neural networks are employed to simply represent the specific energy absorption (SEA), the initial peak crushing load (P1) and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…95 All these parameters could be studied in a future work. Najibi et al 96,97 proved that Multi-objective optimization with Pareto fronts is effective for crashworthiness analysis. Therefore, this method will be adapted in future studies to analyze the crushing of GFRP perforated tubes.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…95 All these parameters could be studied in a future work. Najibi et al 96,97 proved that Multi-objective optimization with Pareto fronts is effective for crashworthiness analysis. Therefore, this method will be adapted in future studies to analyze the crushing of GFRP perforated tubes.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the proposed hybrid network was compared with the well-known traditional machine learning methods, such as k-NN [66], RF [33], and GBM [44]. Additionally, one of the earliest deep learning methods, namely, the group method of data handling (GMDH) [67][68][69], was used for comparison. Each experiment was repeated ten times to alleviate the impact of randomization, and the mean values were reported.…”
Section: Prediction Performance Comparison Of Different Neural Networ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For applying the friction between the components in the simulation, the penalty friction formulations were used. The contact interactions between the bottom substrate and rigid support, and between the top substrate and punch, were modeled as the "surface-to-surface" contact was defined with the friction coefficient of 0.25 [26][27][28][29]. A "self-contact" interface was also selected to simulate the collapse of the specimens when the elements of the lattice core contacted each other.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%