2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing and Implementing a Food Insecurity Screening Initiative for Adult Patients Living With Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract: Using a standardized, respectful method of assessing food insecurity can better equip health-care providers to support food-insecure patients with diabetes self-management. Further evaluation of this initiative is needed to determine how food insecurity screening can affect patients' self-management and related health outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
61
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data suggest that whatever conversations were taking place around these issues between health care professionals and our participants; they were not grounded in discussions cognisant of the lived social and economic realities of those concerned, and therefore seemed to place those individuals at higher risk of feeling more disempowered than empowered by those conversations. One potential way of overcoming the di culty of raising and discussing nancial di culties in clinical consultations might be through the introduction of a nancial screening question within routine clinical practice, as has been muted in other high-income countries [96][97][98]. This suggestion was raised by health professionals interviewed in a separate study by FD, but it was also pointed out there may be practical di culties and unintended negative consequences that would require careful testing prior to any wholesale adoption in practice [49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data suggest that whatever conversations were taking place around these issues between health care professionals and our participants; they were not grounded in discussions cognisant of the lived social and economic realities of those concerned, and therefore seemed to place those individuals at higher risk of feeling more disempowered than empowered by those conversations. One potential way of overcoming the di culty of raising and discussing nancial di culties in clinical consultations might be through the introduction of a nancial screening question within routine clinical practice, as has been muted in other high-income countries [96][97][98]. This suggestion was raised by health professionals interviewed in a separate study by FD, but it was also pointed out there may be practical di culties and unintended negative consequences that would require careful testing prior to any wholesale adoption in practice [49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fundamentally there is an urgent need to rethink public policies that are driving up the numbers of people affected by poverty and food insecurity in the UK [27,[98][99][100]. Healthcare professionals can also play a role by recognising and supporting patients with chronic health problems, and resource needs, such as poverty and food insecurity [59,101,102].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data suggest that whatever conversations were taking place around these issues between health care professionals and our participants; they were not grounded in discussions cognisant of the lived social and economic realities of those concerned, and therefore seemed to place those individuals at higher risk of feeling more disempowered than empowered by those conversations. One potential way of overcoming the di culty of raising and discussing nancial di culties in clinical consultations might be through the introduction of a nancial screening question within routine clinical practice, as has been muted in other high-income countries [94][95][96]. This suggestion was raised by health professionals interviewed in a separate study by FD, but it was also pointed out there may be practical di culties and unintended negative consequences that would require careful testing prior to any wholesale adoption in practice [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the justification for screening rests on the improvements to clinical management that would follow (Berkowitz & Fabreau, ; Elwell‐Sutton, Marshall, Bobby, & Volmert, ; Silverman et al, ), and these are currently unclear, especially when the salient comparator is clinical management by health professionals who get to know about their patients’ food insecurity via supportive and non‐judgemental conversations. Practical experiences with existing food security screening tools (Gundersen, Engelhard, Crumbaugh, & Seligman, ; Pooler et al, ; Thomas, Fitzpatrick, Sidani, & Gucciardi, ) need careful investigation before any widespread use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%