2011
DOI: 10.1177/0022022111416361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing and Evaluating the Social Axioms Survey in Eleven Countries

Abstract: Based on a deductive, culturally decentered approach, new items were generated to improve the reliability of the original Social Axioms Survey, which measures individuals’ general beliefs about the world. In Study 1, results from 11 countries support the original five-factor structure and achieve higher reliability for the axiom dimensions as measured by the new scale. Moreover, moderate but meaningful associations between axiom and Big-Five personality dimensions were found. Temporal change of social axioms a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
123
1
12

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
123
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…We used a short form of the Social Axioms Survey, with 8 items tapping each dimension rated on a 5-point scale (1 = strongly disbelieve to 5 = strongly believe). The internal consistency (Cronbach α) for subscales ranged between 0.68 and 0.85 in a previous cross-cultural study including Chinese and German samples (Leung et al, 2011).…”
Section: Procedures and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We used a short form of the Social Axioms Survey, with 8 items tapping each dimension rated on a 5-point scale (1 = strongly disbelieve to 5 = strongly believe). The internal consistency (Cronbach α) for subscales ranged between 0.68 and 0.85 in a previous cross-cultural study including Chinese and German samples (Leung et al, 2011).…”
Section: Procedures and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Early work on social axioms has been relatively inductive and exploratory in nature (Leung et al, 2012), with researchers around the world validating the factor structure, establishing the construct validity, and examining the predictive power of social axioms (e.g., . With a well-validated factor structure and cumulative evidence about the main effects of social axioms, a deductive approach is needed to theorize about the cognitive processes underlying how social axioms work.…”
Section: World Views In Relation To Self-viewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cuando se hacen intentos desde la psicología por estudiar variables culturales, como es el caso de las normas y creencias que describen a un grupo, de inicio se tiende a utilizar una metodología ideográfica, lo cual es congruente con la indagación en torno al contenido y las manifestaciones socioculturales del fenómeno, como en el caso del estudio de los axiomas sociales (creencias) de Leung y Bond (2004) y Leung et al (2012). Las primeras pesquisas etnográficas realizadas en Hong Kong y Venezuela aportaron las creencias típicas y comunes para estas dos muestras; sin embargo, al crear el instrumento nomotético postulado para estudiar diferencias culturales, rápidamente dieron paso a intentos por generalizar los hallazgos de dos grupos culturales como representantes de todas las creencias posibles para los seres humanos y, por tanto, a la declaración de que los contenidos obtenidos de la etapa exploratoria se podrían sustentar como exhaustivos y universales.…”
Section: La Cultura En La Psicologíaunclassified