2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2012.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing and evaluating intercultural competence: Ethnographies of intercultural encounters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
76
0
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
76
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Spencer-Rodgers (2001, 640) notes that "international [students] constitute one of the most diverse collections of individuals that may be encountered by another group of social perceivers", and growing corpus of research has addressed the ways in which home students engage with this complexity. Spencer-Rodgers (2001) and Spencer-Rodgers and McGovern (2002) find that they are generally well-disposed towards their international peers, although they often hold stereotypical assumptions about the culture of 'others' (Holmes and O'Neill 2012). However, actual contact between the two groups is generally found to be uncommon, unstructured and lacking in meaning (Halualani et al 2004;Halualani 2008) However, while the relationship was positive and rewarding, it was strongly bounded to being an on-campus friendship based around academic support, with the two individuals returning to homophilic social groups when off-campus.…”
Section: Scope Of Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Spencer-Rodgers (2001, 640) notes that "international [students] constitute one of the most diverse collections of individuals that may be encountered by another group of social perceivers", and growing corpus of research has addressed the ways in which home students engage with this complexity. Spencer-Rodgers (2001) and Spencer-Rodgers and McGovern (2002) find that they are generally well-disposed towards their international peers, although they often hold stereotypical assumptions about the culture of 'others' (Holmes and O'Neill 2012). However, actual contact between the two groups is generally found to be uncommon, unstructured and lacking in meaning (Halualani et al 2004;Halualani 2008) However, while the relationship was positive and rewarding, it was strongly bounded to being an on-campus friendship based around academic support, with the two individuals returning to homophilic social groups when off-campus.…”
Section: Scope Of Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the highest level of abstraction, an engagement with diversity provides the individual with the opportunity to develop a certain form of reflexivity which enables them to question their perspectives and cultural heritage by juxtaposing them with those held by equal others (Holmes and O'Neill 2012). This provides opportunities to develop an empathetic approach to problem-solving, as well as the tools to challenge hegemonic power structures.…”
Section: Concluding Reflectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They realised that acknowledging others' perspectives might also include the need to deal with conflict, which required effort. Similarly, Holmes and O'Neill (2012) discussed how the students in their study found that understanding dual perspectives involved work, effort, and time as they grappled with confusion and contradiction present in their own worldviews and those of others. This processual and reciprocal aspect of intercultural learning, especially while abroad, has important implications for the focus, duration, and content of study abroad courses delivered by international offices, and challenges current practice consisting of pre-departure briefings concerning the practical aspects of study abroad.…”
Section: Conclusion and Implications Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kinginger (2015) highlights the need for intercultural preparation and education where study abroad is concerned so that mobile students learn to explore the experience of otherising and being otherised, and of 'discover [ing] their own image in the eyes of their hosts' which may be unsettling (p. 7). Processes of sustained engagement and critical (self) reflection have been demonstrated as important in learning to understand others as well as the self (Holmes & O'Neill, 2012;Savicki, 2008). By inviting students to reflect on their intercultural experience, the IEREST materials promote individuals' intercultural learning and awareness, and hence, the possibilities for transformation and the expansion of their small cultural spheres (Holliday, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Introduction (2) Basics of intercultural communication (3) Basics of intercultural communication: verbal and nonverbal codes (4) Cultural identity development (5) Influences on priority of cultural identity (6) Diversity of worldviews (7) Differences in use of power, leadership (8)…”
Section: B Concept and Theory Of Intercultural Communication For Thementioning
confidence: 99%