Evidence-Based Geriatric Nursing Protocols for Best Practice
DOI: 10.1891/9780826171672.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing and Evaluating Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Systematic Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After this analysis, a set of 21 items was obtained for further study. These were classified according to the level of evidence shown and were ordered according the classification proposed by Lewin, Singleton and Jacobs (2008): ten quantitative studies, five qualitative studies, four systematic reviews of the literature, a literature review and a joint study. Taking into account the level of evidence, five of the items fall into level V, nine into level IV, three into level III and four into the highest level of evidence, level I.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After this analysis, a set of 21 items was obtained for further study. These were classified according to the level of evidence shown and were ordered according the classification proposed by Lewin, Singleton and Jacobs (2008): ten quantitative studies, five qualitative studies, four systematic reviews of the literature, a literature review and a joint study. Taking into account the level of evidence, five of the items fall into level V, nine into level IV, three into level III and four into the highest level of evidence, level I.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Levels of evidence were presented in a structure that enabled an understanding of the value of the presented information or question under study. Of the several available designs, there is a similarity in their hierarchical structure, most commonly represented by a pyramid (Levin et al 2007). Craig and Smyth (2004) argue that this hierarchy of evidence only applies to questions about the effectiveness of therapies or interventions, which is the subject of this integrative review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Craig and Smyth (2004) argue that this hierarchy of evidence only applies to questions about the effectiveness of therapies or interventions, which is the subject of this integrative review. According to Duke University Medical Library (2005, cited by Levin et al 2007), the highest level of evidence is at the top of the pyramid and is characterised by increased relevance of evidence for the clinical situation studied. Level I classification is given to the evidence obtained from systematic reviews and is considered the strongest level of evidence, as is the case of the seven articles included in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reading from left to right, these nine studies, including level of evidence, are displayed in column 1. The studies' levels of evidence range from Level I (strongest—systematic review) to Level IV (less strong—nonexperimental studies) using Levin et al's (2008) evidence hierarchy. Problems and information needs from this literature along with the impact felt by caregiver groups (women or men or both) are described in columns 2 through 4.…”
Section: Part I 2010-2014: Module Topics (Preparation and Validation)mentioning
confidence: 99%