2019
DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing and applying a 'living guidelines' approach to WHO recommendations on maternal and perinatal health

Abstract: How should the WHO most efficiently keep its global recommendations up to date? In this article we describe how WHO developed and applied a ‘living guidelines’ approach to its maternal and perinatal health (MPH) recommendations, based on a systematic and continuous process of prioritisation and updating. Using this approach, 25 new or updated WHO MPH recommendations have been published in 2017–2018. The new approach helps WHO ensure its guidance is responsive to emerging evidence and remains up to date for end… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As part of the WHO’s normative work on supporting evidence-informed policies and practices and its living guidelines approach, 8 on the advice of the Executive Guideline Steering Group, WHO prioritised the updating of the recommendation on MMS on the basis of additional trials published after the release of the 2016 ANC guideline. 9 In addition, an individual participant data meta-analysis was published in 2017, 10 which led to a call for WHO to review the multiple micronutrient recommendation.…”
Section: Context Of and Evidence For An Updated Recommendation On Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of the WHO’s normative work on supporting evidence-informed policies and practices and its living guidelines approach, 8 on the advice of the Executive Guideline Steering Group, WHO prioritised the updating of the recommendation on MMS on the basis of additional trials published after the release of the 2016 ANC guideline. 9 In addition, an individual participant data meta-analysis was published in 2017, 10 which led to a call for WHO to review the multiple micronutrient recommendation.…”
Section: Context Of and Evidence For An Updated Recommendation On Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Living evidence services may support the idea of 'living practice guidelines' that are one step closer to reality, with the hope to produce timely, up-to-date and high-quality guidelines for promoting health and quality of life (Akl, Meerpohl, Elliott, Kahale, & Schunemann, 2017). For example, the World Health Organization (WHO) has already developed and applied a 'living guidelines' approach to its maternal and perinatal health (MPH) recommendations (Vogel et al, 2019). Table 2 is an indicative summary table demonstrating which category of the actors of the health care system (clinicians, medical researchers and students) would benefit the most from each of the Web-based resources listed in this review study (note that more than one category could benefit from the same resource).…”
Section: Resources That Synthesise Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 This approach has been used successfully in stroke, diabetes, maternal health and other topics. [18][19][20] The National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce was established in March 2020 to produce living recommendations on the clinical care of people with COVID-19 in Australia. 21 As of 17…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%