1997
DOI: 10.7249/rb35-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing an Affordable Fighter for the Future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This assumption comes from the fact 28,29 that, frequent maneuvers at different altitude levels introduce energy waste and may severely increase RCS value of LO UCAV and thus possibility of DTE by hostile radars; the mass of LO UCAV is taken as a constant value. Since typical penetration missions for LO UCAV are generally accomplished within a time less than 0.5 or 1 h 30 (this time is calculated when LO UCAV flies from penetration ingress to egress), the fuel burn during this time is relatively small in comparison with its empty weight. Besides of that, fuel burn is not considered in priority for military penetration.…”
Section: Adaptive Scheduling Paradigm and Modeling Of Real‐time Route...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This assumption comes from the fact 28,29 that, frequent maneuvers at different altitude levels introduce energy waste and may severely increase RCS value of LO UCAV and thus possibility of DTE by hostile radars; the mass of LO UCAV is taken as a constant value. Since typical penetration missions for LO UCAV are generally accomplished within a time less than 0.5 or 1 h 30 (this time is calculated when LO UCAV flies from penetration ingress to egress), the fuel burn during this time is relatively small in comparison with its empty weight. Besides of that, fuel burn is not considered in priority for military penetration.…”
Section: Adaptive Scheduling Paradigm and Modeling Of Real‐time Route...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The battlefield for penetration in this paper is a 400 by 400 km square area, which can cover typically horizontal range scenarios for LO UCAV to implement an “one‐way” penetration mission 30 . The ingress point, which is the position of LO UCAV first entering the battlefield, is selected at top of the lower‐left corner of this square region with altitude z$$ z $$ as 30,000 m; its horizontal position values aligned with east and north are set to zero.…”
Section: Numerical Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%