1997
DOI: 10.1300/j050v07n04_05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing Advertising and Promotion Strategies for Higher Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies postulate that students may make their college choices following an elimination process (Tversky, 1972) or by utilizing a dominance principle (Resnick, 1987) in which certain college choice factors increase in prominence and differentiate students' perceptions of certain institutions (Hamrick & Hossler, 1996). Berger and Wallingford (1996) the college selection process in an attempt to connect with the prospective students' states of mind during the various process stages. Other research suggests that more abstract factors like academics and reputation are the two most important factors in prospective students' college selection processes with more concrete factors such as cost and location following closely behind (The Brand Called U, 2003).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies postulate that students may make their college choices following an elimination process (Tversky, 1972) or by utilizing a dominance principle (Resnick, 1987) in which certain college choice factors increase in prominence and differentiate students' perceptions of certain institutions (Hamrick & Hossler, 1996). Berger and Wallingford (1996) the college selection process in an attempt to connect with the prospective students' states of mind during the various process stages. Other research suggests that more abstract factors like academics and reputation are the two most important factors in prospective students' college selection processes with more concrete factors such as cost and location following closely behind (The Brand Called U, 2003).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate an intangible offering, consumers look to people within the organization for clues. Berger and Wallingford (1996) apply the hierarchy of communication goals, widely used in consumer advertising, to higher education in an effort to connect with the prospective students' state of mind when selecting a college to attend. Research suggests that "academics" and "reputation" (less concrete factors) are the two most important factors in selecting a college to attend, with "cost" and "location" (more concrete factors) following closely behind ("The brand called .…”
Section: Branding and The College Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A quick trawl of the recent educational literature produces plenty of advice on: market attractiveness (Bainbridge, 1997); competitive advantage (Mazzarol & Soutar, 1999); market mapping (Gumport, 1997); student needs (Lin, 1997); capitalising on tangible assets (Coates, 1998); advertising (Jugenheimer, 1995;Berger & Wallingford, 1996); image management (Koku, 1997;Symes, 1998); tangibility (Yost & Tucker, 1995); products (Chan & Imrie, 1995;Hesketh & Knight, 1999); ITC (Selwyn, 1999); market expansion (Antonazzi, 1998;Bagwell, 1998;Shinn et al, 1999); market research (Quirke, 1995); and pricing (Roberts, 1999). In addition, there are the proceedings of the American Marketing Association's Symposia on the Marketing of Higher Education, the annual Higher Education External Relations Association conference plus Kotler & Fox's (1995) (general) and Ryans & Shanklin's (1986) (higher) education texts on strategic planning and marketing.…”
Section: It [The Education Uk Brand] Enables Students To See Britain mentioning
confidence: 99%