2014
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a strategic research framework for Sport and Exercise Medicine

Abstract: The strategic framework provides guidelines for the development and sustainable management of an SEM research programme. It will make a substantial contribution to the research, further development, and ultimately the status of SEM in South Africa.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current results show the sensitivity of CRC to training and detraining and highlight the value of incorporating complex systems approaches into the current strategic research framework for sport and exercise medicine (Holtzhausen et al, 2014 ). However, a longer term study would be required to test the sensitivity of CRC assessments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The current results show the sensitivity of CRC to training and detraining and highlight the value of incorporating complex systems approaches into the current strategic research framework for sport and exercise medicine (Holtzhausen et al, 2014 ). However, a longer term study would be required to test the sensitivity of CRC assessments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…It then seems reasonable to evaluate CRC together with the commonly registered maximal performance and cardiorespiratory variables to improve the interpretation of CET. These results highlight the value of incorporating complex systems approaches into the current strategic research framework for sport and exercise medicine (Holtzhausen et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Despite using Dillman’s recommendation of sending multiple reminders to the non-responders,22 the response rate was lower than expected. However, the study is in the range of Delphi studies in the sports and exercise medicine area where sample sizes of 10–60 participants have been reported 17 18…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of this technique in comparison to other sampling techniques or methodologies (eg, nominal group or focus groups) is that it enables many individuals across a wide geographical area to contribute their expert opinion anonymously, thus avoiding domination of the consensus process by one or a few experts. The Delphi technique, originally developed in the 1940s as a strategic forecasting tool,15is widely used to obtain group consensus at minimal cost in a number of different domains including sports medicine 16–19. Overseen by a steering committee, the Delphi facilitates group consensus from a panel of experts via iterative surveys, where responses in each round are refined in light of group data from previous rounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%