2021
DOI: 10.1177/21514593211036235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a Simpler Prognosticating Tool: Comparing the Combined Assessment of Risk Encountered in Surgery Score with Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index and The American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Score in Predicting 2 years Mortality after Hip Fracture Surgery

Abstract: Background: The use of risk stratification tools in identifying high-risk hip fracture patients plays an important role during treatment. The aim of this study was to compare our locally derived Combined Assessment of Risk Encountered in Surgery (CARES) score with the the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA-PS) score and the Deyo–Charlson Comorbidity Index (D-CCI) in predicting 2-year mortality after hip fracture surgery. Methods and Material: A retrospective study was conducted on surgi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
2
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As it used a prospective observational design, this study provided stronger association, allowing for better interpretation of mortality. In the present study, the longest follow-up was 84.19 months with an average of 38.9 months, which was longer than the 1 year used in a study by Chen et al ( 35 ) and Garabano et al ( 24 ), as well as the 2 years used in a study by Cher et al ( 25 ), and 37.2 months in a study by Pan et al ( 8 ). The sample size in our study was also larger than those used in these previous studies ( 8 , 24 , 25 , 33 , 35 ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As it used a prospective observational design, this study provided stronger association, allowing for better interpretation of mortality. In the present study, the longest follow-up was 84.19 months with an average of 38.9 months, which was longer than the 1 year used in a study by Chen et al ( 35 ) and Garabano et al ( 24 ), as well as the 2 years used in a study by Cher et al ( 25 ), and 37.2 months in a study by Pan et al ( 8 ). The sample size in our study was also larger than those used in these previous studies ( 8 , 24 , 25 , 33 , 35 ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…In the present study, the longest follow-up was 84.19 months with an average of 38.9 months, which was longer than the 1 year used in a study by Chen et al ( 35 ) and Garabano et al ( 24 ), as well as the 2 years used in a study by Cher et al ( 25 ), and 37.2 months in a study by Pan et al ( 8 ). The sample size in our study was also larger than those used in these previous studies ( 8 , 24 , 25 , 33 , 35 ). In addition, the results of the sensitivity analysis in the present study were stable.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
See 2 more Smart Citations