Developing a Research Agenda for The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons

Burt, Caroline; Cima, Robert R.; Koltun, Walter A.; Littlejohn, Charles E.; Ricciardi, Rocco; Temple, Larissa K.; Rothenberger, David A.; Baxter, Nancy N.

doi:10.1007/dcr.0b013e3181a0b358

Cited by 36 publications

(40 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…26,27 Strengths of the current study include an outline of ongoing studies. This is important as, although the volume of evidence for prophylactic mesh has increased, the respective gaps in evidence still persist in ongoing research.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prophylactic Mesh During Primary Stoma Formation to Prevent Parastomal Hernia

Chapman

Wood

Drake

et al. 2017

Diseases of the Colon &Amp; Rectum

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

word count: 294 Words Manuscript word count: 3,062 WordsMeSH Keywords: stoma, parastomal hernia, prophylactic mesh Acknowledgments: The authors acknowledge assistance from Leeds NIHR Healthcare Technology Cooperative (HTC) in Colorectal Therapies in design and execution of the study. Also acknowledged is the assistance of corresponding authors of included studies for their responses to data enquiries.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prophylactic Mesh During Primary Stoma Formation to Prevent Parastomal Hernia

Chapman

Wood

Drake

et al. 2017

Diseases of the Colon &Amp; Rectum

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Despite this limitation, the survey did receive robust participation for all three rounds, and the sample size was comparable to or greater than that of similar conference-based surveys. 31,32 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Defining a Research Agenda for Patient-Reported Outcomes in Surgery

et al. 2016

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Identifying timely and important research questions using relevant patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in surgery remains paramount in the current medical climate. The inaugural Patient-Reported Outcomes in Surgery Conference brought together stakeholders in PROs research in surgery, with the aim of creating a research agenda to help determine future directions and advance cross-disciplinary collaboration. Study Design An iterative Web-based interface was used to create a modified Delphi survey. Participation was limited to conference registrants, which included surgeons, PROs researchers, payers, and other stakeholders. In the first round, research items were generated from qualitative review of responses to open-ended prompts. In the second round, items were ranked using a 5-point Likert scale; attendees were also asked to submit any new items. In the final round, the top 30 items and newly submitted items were redistributed for final ranking using a 3-point Likert scale. The top 20 items by mean rating were selected for the research agenda. Results In round one, participants submitted 459 items, which were reduced to 53 distinct items within seven themes of PROs research. A research agenda was formulated after two successive rounds of ranking. The research agenda identified three themes important for future PROs research in surgery: (1) PROs in the decision-making process, (2) integrating PROs into the EHR and, (3) measuring quality in surgery with PROs. Conclusions The PROS Conference research agenda was created using a modified Delphi survey of stakeholders that will help researchers, surgeons, and funders identify crucial areas of future PROs research in surgery.

show abstract

“…These critiques are collected in a systematic process, which is centered on personal points of view and are agreed upon by the larger group (Steurer, 2011). Among the advantages of this technique is the possibility that the experts can be from different parts of the world and can participate electronically because there is not a mutual influence between them (Burt et al, 2009). Having considered these premises, in this study, three APA specialists participated, each of which has ample experience in the evaluative and editing processes of scientific articles, and in the editing of journals in both English and Spanish.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Design and Validation of a Rubric to Assess the Use of American Psychological Association Style in scientific articles

Merma-Molina

Alfaro²,

González³

2017

J. New Approaches Educ. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, the researchers will explore the process of designing and validating a rubric to evaluate the adaptation of scientific articles in the format of the American Psychological Association (APA). The rubric will evaluate certain aspects of the APA format that allow authors, editors, and evaluators to decide if the scientific article is coherent with these rules. Overall, the rubric will concentrate on General Aspects of the article and on the Citation System. To do this, 10 articles that were published within 2012-2016 and included in the Journal Citation Report will be analyzed using technical expertise. After doing 5 pilot studies, the results showed the validity and the reliability of the instrument. Furthermore, the process showed the evidence of the possibilities of the rubric to contribute to uniform criteria that can be used as a didactic tool in different scenarios.

show abstract

Developing a Research Agenda for The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons

Abstract: The research agenda produced by this study reflects the clinical issues of greatest importance to colorectal surgeons. The results are of potential benefit to researchers, funding organizations, medical journals, and ultimately, patients.

Cited by 36 publications

References 17 publications

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prophylactic Mesh During Primary Stoma Formation to Prevent Parastomal Hernia

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prophylactic Mesh During Primary Stoma Formation to Prevent Parastomal Hernia

Defining a Research Agenda for Patient-Reported Outcomes in Surgery

Design and Validation of a Rubric to Assess the Use of American Psychological Association Style in scientific articles

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About