This study compared an affective (Gestalt two-chair intervention) and a cognitive-behavioral (problem-solving) counseling intervention used to help clients resolve intrapersonal conflicts related to a decision. Forty-eight people were randomly assigned to three groups: a problemsolving group (n = 16), a two-chair group (n = 16), and a waiting-list control group (n = 16). Trained counselors saw clients for two sessions. Subjects were pretested and posttested on measures of indecision and stage of decision making. A one-way analysis of variance revealed that the affective intervention was more effective than the cognitivebehavioral intervention or no treatment for reducing indecision. Both counseling approaches were more effective than no treatment in facilitating movement through the stages of decision making.This study is based on a doctoral dissertation by the first author. Appreciation is expressed to Gloria J. Lewis, who directed the dissertation.