Developing a programme theory to explain how primary health care teams learn to respond to intimate partner violence: a realist case-study

Abstract

BackgroundDespite the progress made on policies and programmes to strengthen primary health care teams’ response to Intimate Partner Violence, the literature shows that encounters between women exposed to IPV and health-care providers are not always satisfactory, and a number of barriers that prevent individual health-care providers from responding to IPV have been identified. We carried out a realist case study, for which we developed and tested a programme theory that seeks to explain how, why and under which circumstances a primary health care team in Spain learned to respond to IPV.MethodsA realist case study design was chosen to allow for an in-depth exploration of the linkages between context, intervention, mechanisms and outcomes as they happen in their natural setting. The first author collected data at the primary health care center La Virgen (pseudonym) through the review of documents, observation and interviews with health systems’ managers, team members, women patients, and members of external services. The quality of the IPV case management was assessed with the PREMIS tool.ResultsThis study found that the health care team at La Virgen has managed 1) to engage a number of staff members in actively responding to IPV, 2) to establish good coordination, mutual support and continuous learning processes related to IPV, 3) to establish adequate internal referrals within La Virgen, and 4) to establish good coordination and referral systems with other services. Team and individual level factors have triggered the capacity and interest in creating spaces for team leaning, team work and therapeutic responses to IPV in La Virgen, although individual motivation strongly affected this mechanism. Regional interventions did not trigger individual and/ or team responses but legitimated the workings of motivated professionals.ConclusionsThe primary health care team of La Virgen is involved in a continuous learning process, even as participation in the process varies between professionals. This process has been supported, but not caused, by a favourable policy for integration of a health care response to IPV. Specific contextual factors of La Virgen facilitated the uptake of the policy. To some extent, the performance of La Virgen has the potential to shape the IPV learning processes of other primary health care teams in Murcia.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0899-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Barriers and Facilitators to Integrating Health Service Responses to Intimate Partner Violence in Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries: A Comparative Health Systems and Service Analysis

“…), even among less motivated staff (Goicolea et al. ). In addition, linking health services with community services and volunteers can help improve community awareness of violence and offer additional support services in rural areas where these are scarce (Turan et al.…”

Multiple struggles in fighting violence against women: implications among Romani women leaders in Spain

“…Willingness or personal motivation has been identified in other contexts (for example, primary health care) as a key factor in generation of responses to VAW [39]. This motivation could go hand in hand with training, awareness of issues of gender and/or – as our interviewees argue – the experience of having worked with women in this situation.…”

Thinking differently: Re‐framing family violence responsiveness in the mental health and addictions health care context

“…In practice, identifying victims is a “complex process that requires more than asking questions and following the steps of a protocol” (Goicolea, Hurtig, San Sebastian, Vives‐Cases, & Marchal, ). Practitioners needed to ask June about her social history and pay close attention to the multiple forms of communication co‐occurring – listening for the feelings behind her words, hearing what she said and did not say, and being aware of her and their own body language (World Health Organization, , p. 17).…”