2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2014.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a practical evaluation framework for identifying critical factors to achieve supply chain agility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yanan et al [25] believe that there has been a significant effect that the design of a plant can have on its agile and dynamic performance. Sangari et al [26] contend that supply chain agility is a key determinant of competitiveness and they developed a practical evaluation framework that serves to identify critical factors for achieving supply chain agility. Gilgor et al [27] feel that traditionally, researchers have claimed agility as an attribute closely tied to the effectiveness of strategic supply chain management that is closely associated with customer effectiveness.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yanan et al [25] believe that there has been a significant effect that the design of a plant can have on its agile and dynamic performance. Sangari et al [26] contend that supply chain agility is a key determinant of competitiveness and they developed a practical evaluation framework that serves to identify critical factors for achieving supply chain agility. Gilgor et al [27] feel that traditionally, researchers have claimed agility as an attribute closely tied to the effectiveness of strategic supply chain management that is closely associated with customer effectiveness.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, ANP is proposed to solve such problems (Sangari et al 2015;Lee, Kim 2000;Meade, Sarkis 1998;Meade, Presley 2002).…”
Section: Analytic Network Process (Anp) Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, a number of literature reviews with different focuses have been realised on agile manufacturing (Sangari et al, 2015;Shaw et al, 2005;Chan et al, 2017;Fayezi et al, 2017). One can cite Charles et al (2010), in which agility is defined as the ability of a system to be flexible, in a reactive and efficient manner.…”
Section: Agile Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, some authors have proposed metrics to characterise different facets of agility (Shaarabh et al, 2014;Routroy et al, 2015;Sangari et al, 2015;Lee et al, 2017). Due to the complexity of the concept, they all propose a set of metrics that are related to physical performances of the manufacturing system or the supply chain.…”
Section: Agile Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%