2013
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)te.1943-5436.0000494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a Network-Level Structural Capacity Index for Asphalt Pavements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A literature review was conducted to determine the network-level structural indices used by agencies that have begun incorporating deflection testing into their network-level testing schemes. A more detailed description of the indices considered in this study can be found in Bryce et al (10). The list of indices was narrowed down to the two that were the most promising for immediate implementation in the state pavement management system: the structural strength indicator (SSI) and the structural condition index (SCI).…”
Section: Structural Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A literature review was conducted to determine the network-level structural indices used by agencies that have begun incorporating deflection testing into their network-level testing schemes. A more detailed description of the indices considered in this study can be found in Bryce et al (10). The list of indices was narrowed down to the two that were the most promising for immediate implementation in the state pavement management system: the structural strength indicator (SSI) and the structural condition index (SCI).…”
Section: Structural Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the introduction of a structural capacity index is suggested in network-level decisions to find the most cost-effective rehabilitation option [89]. On this basis, simplified deflection-based analytical techniques [90] and a new index related to the Structural Capacity Index (SCI) [91] have been introduced.…”
Section: Pavement Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where d = the required overlay in inches, SN req and SN eff are the required and effective SN, respectively; C is a factor based on the condition of the pavement [40]; the C factor represents the percent of the contributing structure that remains in the removed layer of asphalt; for the extent of this study, the value C = 0.35 would be used. This relationship based on a relationship proposed by Bryce, Flintsch, Katicha and Diefenderfer [20] assumes that the asphalt has an equivalent structural coefficient of 0.44 per in., and that the thickness of the design rehabilitation treatment that is associated with the contribution of the pavement overlay thickness will increase the current structural capacity in order to support the predicted accumulated traffic over the design period.…”
Section: Data Analysis: Deflection Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach was adopted by the Virginia DOT at the network-level, who used it as a screening tool. SCI discriminates between pavements that needs structural reinforcement (SCI < 1) and those that are in sound structural condition (SCI > 1), giving a measure of the degree of structural deficiency [20]. Therefore, the remaining pavement structural capacity and service life can be calculated with this information for network-level decisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%