2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-019-02428-z
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a Model for Decision-Makers in Dynamic Modeling of Urban Water System Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing urbanization and climate change have increased the diversion volume of stormwater from catchments, which has affected the water quality of receiving bodies (river, lake or sea) and has resulted in more frequent sewer floods (Fletcher et al 2013;Karimlou et al 2020). The above has also deteriorated the functionality of sewer systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing urbanization and climate change have increased the diversion volume of stormwater from catchments, which has affected the water quality of receiving bodies (river, lake or sea) and has resulted in more frequent sewer floods (Fletcher et al 2013;Karimlou et al 2020). The above has also deteriorated the functionality of sewer systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Appropriate WDN management can also prove an effective means of tackling NRW issues (Bhagat et al , 2019; Hussein et al , 2017; Kamarudin and Ismail, 2016; Yi et al , 2017), with NRW an indicator of WDN performance (Kamarudin and Ismail, 2016). There are many aspects to WDN management: (1) asset management (Mugisha, 2013); (2) dynamic modeling, which is based on a method that selects the best management actions (Karimlou et al , 2020); (3) operation and maintenance, which is applied to boreholes and hand pumps within a WDN (Silombela et al , 2018); (4) record keeping (Silombela et al , 2018); (5) programs such as GIS and management information system tools, which help in decision making and WDN management (Ndirangu et al , 2013); (6) budget management and the prioritization of NRW activities (Gambe, 2015); (7) the shift from traditional top-down approaches toward bottom-up approaches in certain WDNs, which emphasizes the involvement of multiple-stakeholders (Lai et al , 2017); (8) organizations that control the activity of utilities (González-Gómez et al , 2011). The main benefits of WDN management are decreasing WL and reducing the overall NRW (González-Gómez et al , 2011; Saadr and Anuar, 2019; Silombela et al , 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water supply utilities generally apply to increase their revenues using the traditional method of reducing non-revenue water (NRW) that consists of leakage reduction, meter repair, and commercial activities, which is a traditional method that is widely used by water supply providers worldwide (Dimaano 2015;Mukherjee et al 2015;Karimlou et al 2020). However, this study presents the first trial by WASA-F to increase revenue by not only reducing NRW in the traditional way but also by improving its water supply services of water pressure and supply time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%