Developing a method to estimate practice denominators for a national Canadian electronic medical record database

Abstract

Background. Calculating disease prevalence requires both a numerator (number of persons with a disease) and a matching denominator (the 'population at risk' being studied). Determining primary care practice denominators is challenging.Objective. To develop and test a method to calculate primary care practice denominators. Methods.We compared a 'corrected yearly contact group', or practice population, with the number of patients enrolled with practices. The yearly contact group was the set of patients with a visit noted in the electronic medical records during the past year. The correction factor was the proportion of patients that reported contacting their physician in the past year. Eighty-one physicians from Toronto and Kingston, Ontario, provided data. The main outcome measure was the ratio of practice population to the number of enrolled patients. Other measures included the change in ratio over 2 years, differences between locations, and differences by provider, practice and patient characteristics. Results.The ratio of practice population to enrolled patients was 1.03 in 2010 (95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.05) and 1.03 in 2011 (95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.05). There was no change in the ratio over time. Ratios by location, provider or practice characteristics differed by less than 10%. There was a slight under-estimation of practice population for younger male patients and over-estimation for female patients.Conclusion. This method provided a denominator that was reasonably similar to the enrolled population and was stable over time and by location, provider and practice characteristics. In regions without patient enrollment, this may provide an estimate of practice denominators.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care: an epidemiologic cohort study from the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network

“…We first calculated the prevalence rates for COPD, classified by an appropriate age group and sex. We estimated the prevalence using the denominator described by Greiver and colleagues 19 because it approximates the general population while the 24-month contact group approximates those attending the practice. We then calculated age-and sex-standardized prevalence rates according to Canadian national age and sex distribution (census 2011).…”

Incorporação de Tecnologias de Informação e Comunicação e qualidade na atenção básica em saúde no Brasil

“…No Canadá, 49% de médicos da atenção básica relataram o uso de um sistema RES em 2010 5 . Nos Estados Unidos 7 , na atenção ambulatorial, observou-se, em 2011, que 35% dos consultórios possuíam um RES básico.…”

Is the Use of Information and Communication Technology Associated With Aspects of Women's Primary Health Care in Brazil?

“…In 2015, in Finland, 75% of PCUs had electronic records (World Health Organization, 2016). In Canada, 49% of primary care doctors reported using an EHR, in 2010 (Greiver et al, 2013). In 2011, in the United States (Black et al, 2011), usage of an HER was observed in 35% of outpatient care medical offices.…”

“…In 2013, a Canadian systematic review demonstrated that there was little evidence on specific benefits: EHRs were not precise enough to serve as base in clinical application; there was a lack of alignment between the EHR and the clinical work flow and the demonstrable value for the clinics was uncertain (Greiver et al, 2013). …”