2018
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.9716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a Mental Health eClinic to Improve Access to and Quality of Mental Health Care for Young People: Using Participatory Design as Research Methodologies

Abstract: BackgroundEach year, many young Australians aged between 16 and 25 years experience a mental health disorder, yet only a small proportion access services and even fewer receive timely and evidence-based treatments. Today, with ever-increasing access to the Internet and use of technology, the potential to provide all young people with access (24 hours a day, 7 days a week) to the support they require to improve their mental health and well-being is promising.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to use participato… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
117
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
2
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the prototypic online platform brought together a general health and wellbeing prototype (Chapter 3) with a more specialised mental health e‐clinic prototype (Chapter 6). Subsequent integration of these two prototypes onto one online platform also required the development of single sign‐on (a user authentication service that allows users to access multiple applications with one set of login credentials [eg, email and password]) and interoperability of data between the two prototypes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, the prototypic online platform brought together a general health and wellbeing prototype (Chapter 3) with a more specialised mental health e‐clinic prototype (Chapter 6). Subsequent integration of these two prototypes onto one online platform also required the development of single sign‐on (a user authentication service that allows users to access multiple applications with one set of login credentials [eg, email and password]) and interoperability of data between the two prototypes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A prototypic mental health e‐clinic was co‐designed with young people, health professionals and researchers . It aimed to deliver best practice clinical services online to young people experiencing mental health problems.…”
Section: Study 4: Implementation Study Of a Prototypic E‐clinic Beingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The InnoWell Platform is an Australian example of health information technology that has been co‐designed to be integrated within locally connected care systems with the aim of improving access, efficiency, outcomes and care continuity . It does this by enabling real‐time and comprehensive online assessment (including the determination of clinical stage and multidimensional needs), self‐monitoring and routine outcome monitoring, and facilitation of access to high quality online psychological interventions. Such new and innovative technologies allow health professionals and services to provide highly personalised and measurement‐based care .…”
Section: Role Of Technology In Our Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final sample comprised of 19 articles included in this review and provides outcome evidence in the following four domains: alternative models [21,26,27,29,30]; interventions applied to Crisis [22,[31][32][33]; telepsychiatry and mobile applications applied to mental health crisis [35,38,39,41]; and experience and satisfaction with mental health crisis provision [25,28,34,36,37,40].…”
Section: Synthesis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 19 studies included in this review came from 5 different countries; 8 studies came from the UK [21,22,[25][26][27][28][29][30], 5 from the US [31][32][33][34][35], 3 from Australia [36][37][38], 2 from Canada [39,40] and 1 from Denmark [41]. Eight studies utilised a qualitative methodology [25,28,29,34,[36][37][38]40] and two studies were based on a qualitative case-study approach [22,33]. In contrast, three studies followed a quantitative descriptive approach [30,35,39], while one study had a mixed-methods design [26].…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%