2006
DOI: 10.1785/0120050179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a Map of Geologically Defined Site-Condition Categories for California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
193
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(211 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
7
193
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We apply amplitude-dependent amplification factors as a function of V S30 (Borcherdt 1994) with NEHRP class B/C as a reference (Wills and Clahan 2006); this reference agrees well with the attenuation relation for rock condition in Equation 1 (Sokolov et al 2008). Figure 8 shows shake maps calculated from the two approaches for site amplification mapping, on the left using the topographic slope (Wald and Allen 2007), on the right using the seismological method developed in this paper.…”
Section: Comparison With Wald and Allen (2007)supporting
confidence: 53%
“…We apply amplitude-dependent amplification factors as a function of V S30 (Borcherdt 1994) with NEHRP class B/C as a reference (Wills and Clahan 2006); this reference agrees well with the attenuation relation for rock condition in Equation 1 (Sokolov et al 2008). Figure 8 shows shake maps calculated from the two approaches for site amplification mapping, on the left using the topographic slope (Wald and Allen 2007), on the right using the seismological method developed in this paper.…”
Section: Comparison With Wald and Allen (2007)supporting
confidence: 53%
“…Iwahashi et al [46] presented a correlation between V S30 measurements and several topographic parameters, including topographic heights, slope gradient, local convexity, and surface texture. Other authors have proposed different approaches based on geomorphological units [47], geotechnical categories [48] and geological units [49][50][51], as a proxy for V S30 assessment. More recently, Thompson et al [52] proposed a V S30 map for California, United States, using a hybrid geostatistical approach to account for geology, topography, and site-specific shear wave velocity measurements.…”
Section: Assessment Of Seismic Site Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geological attributes are often connected to shear wave velocity in view of limited number of observation sites (e.g. Wills and Silva, 1998;Wills and Clahan, 2006). On the basis of the overlapping ranges of V S,30 accorded to different geological units, Wills et al (2000) introduced intermediate classes namely BC, CD, and DE corresponding to an average V S,30 of 760 m/s, 360 m/s, and 180 m/s, respectively.…”
Section: Site Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%